2000
DOI: 10.2106/00004623-200007000-00006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficacy of Postoperative Blood Salvage Following Total Hip Arthroplasty in Patients with and without Deposited Autologous Units*

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
30
1
2

Year Published

2003
2003
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(34 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
30
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results verified no reduction in the need for postoperative ABT by using OrthoPAT 1 as a retransfusion device for WSB. This is in contrast to some studies [7,11,20,22,24,34] reporting a decreased requirement for ABT with a lower risk of transfusionassociated complications and economic benefit using one of several autologous retransfusion devices (OrthoPAT . In contradiction to our data, del Trujillo et al postulated a lower ABT rate for patients undergoing THAs who were treated with the OrthoPAT 1 retransfusion device [7].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 77%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…Our results verified no reduction in the need for postoperative ABT by using OrthoPAT 1 as a retransfusion device for WSB. This is in contrast to some studies [7,11,20,22,24,34] reporting a decreased requirement for ABT with a lower risk of transfusionassociated complications and economic benefit using one of several autologous retransfusion devices (OrthoPAT . In contradiction to our data, del Trujillo et al postulated a lower ABT rate for patients undergoing THAs who were treated with the OrthoPAT 1 retransfusion device [7].…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 77%
“…Therefore a reliable comparison with our results is not possible (Table 3). In addition, the retrospective study design [11], the comparison of a prospective study group with a retrospective control group [22], or the missing randomization procedure in a prospective published trial [7], all postulating a lower ABT rate for the reinfusion group, are critical limitations and therefore not directly comparable to our prospective, randomized study. Some previous studies that have noted only a small or no benefit in reducing the need for postoperative ABT evaluated a retransfusion device for USB [17,18,23,30].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
See 3 more Smart Citations