Although posttraumatic osteoarthritis (OA) is a common and important entity in orthopedic practice, no data presently exist regarding its prevalence or its relative burden of disease. A population-based estimate was formulated, based on one large institution's experience in terms of its fraction of patients with OA presenting to lower-extremity adult reconstructive clinics with OA of posttraumatic origin. The relative proportion of these patients undergoing total joint replacement provided a basis for extrapolating institutional experience with posttraumatic OA to a populationwide estimate because the numbers of lower-extremity total joint arthroplasty procedures performed were reliably tabulated both within the institution and populationwide. By this methodology, approximately 12% of the overall prevalence of symptomatic OA is attributable to posttraumatic OA of the hip, knee, or ankle. This corresponds to approximately 5.6 million individuals in the United States being affected by posttraumatic OA sufficiently severe to have caused them to present for care by an orthopedic lower-extremity adult reconstructive surgeon. Further, based on the relative prevalence of OA versus rheumatoid arthritis, and their relative impacts as assessed by the SF-36 (Short-Form 36) lower-extremity physical composite scores, about 85.5% of the societal costs of arthritis are attributable to OA. The corresponding aggregate financial burden specifically of posttraumatic OA is Dollars 3.06 billion annually, or approximately 0.15% of the total U.S. health care direct cost outlay.

Even with current treatments of acute joint injuries, more than 40% of people who suffer significant ligament or meniscus tears, or articular surface injuries, will develop osteoarthritis (OA). Correspondingly, 12% or more of all patients with lower extremity OA have a history of joint injury. Recent research suggests that acute joint damage that occurs at the time of an injury initiates a sequence of events that can lead to progressive articular surface damage. New molecular interventions, combined with evolving surgical methods, aim to minimize or prevent progressive tissue damage triggered by joint injury. Seizing the potential for progress in the treatment of joint injuries to forestall OA will depend on advances in (1) quantitative methods of assessing the injury severity, including both structural damage and biologic responses, (2) understanding of the pathogenesis of post-traumatic OA, taking into account potential interactions among the different tissues and the role of post-traumatic incongruity and instability, and (3) application of engineering and molecular research to develop new methods of treating injured joints. This paper highlights recent advances in understanding of the structural damage and the acute biological response following joint injury, and it identifies important directions for future research. ß

No abstract

No abstract