2016
DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(16)30384-1
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficacy of infant simulator programmes to prevent teenage pregnancy: a school-based cluster randomised controlled trial in Western Australia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
32
1
5

Year Published

2017
2017
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(46 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
2
32
1
5
Order By: Relevance
“…indicated that using simulator baby didn't result in reducing teen pregnancy, however, the study of the results need to be considered, such as a higher pregnancy risks in girls who were in intervention groups (Brinkman et al, 2016). Barnett and Hurst (2004) investigated 227 eighth and tenth graders students.…”
Section: International Journal Of Research Studies In Educational Tecmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…indicated that using simulator baby didn't result in reducing teen pregnancy, however, the study of the results need to be considered, such as a higher pregnancy risks in girls who were in intervention groups (Brinkman et al, 2016). Barnett and Hurst (2004) investigated 227 eighth and tenth graders students.…”
Section: International Journal Of Research Studies In Educational Tecmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…During the past 20 years, the studies of infant simulators have extended their associated curriculum to consist of not only courses on pregnancy prevention, but also courses in parenting and child development, and courses for students interested in careers in childcare (Brinkman, Johnson, Codde, Hart, Straton, Mittinty, & Silburn, 2016). Many studies showed that simulation contributed to the students' learning in multiple professional fields, like, medical (Beth, Cunningham, & McIntosh, 2000), health care (Johannesson, Silén, Kvist, & Hult, 2013), and science learning (Sauter, Uttal, Rapp, Downing, & Jona, 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hubo un aumento del número de embarazos para el grupo de edad de mayores de 19, aunque no fue significativo (RR 1,57; IC 95% 0,84-2,9; p = 0,1500)PositivoBrinkman et al 15 20162.834 adolescentes mujeres (1.567 en el grupo intervención y 1.267 en el grupo control), con edades entre 13 y 15 añosSe encuentra significativamente una mayor proporción de embarazos en el grupo intervención que en el grupo control (χ 2  = 20,8; p = 0,000044)NegativoStephenson et al 16 20084.776 adolescentes (2.247 del grupo control y 2.529 del grupo intervención), con edades entre 13 y 14 añosNo se encuentran diferencias para la tasa de embarazos y abortos a los 18 y 20 años entre las chicas del grupo intervención y control (p > 0,05). Se encuentran diferencias significativas entre las chicas del grupo intervención y control para el número de embarazos autorreportados a los 18 años (OR 0,62; IC 0,42-0,91).…”
Section: Resultsunclassified
“…Modificación en la tasa de embarazos: se seleccionaron 4 estudios13, 14, 15, 16 cuyo indicador de efectividad de las intervenciones educativas era una modificación en la tasa de embarazo. Dos de ellas13, 14 hallan una reducción significativa de la misma, mientras que las investigaciones de Brinkman et al 15 y Stephenson et al 16 no obtienen diferencias significativas entre los grupos intervención y control.…”
Section: Resultsunclassified
See 1 more Smart Citation