1991
DOI: 10.1213/00000539-199101000-00010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficacy of Ephedrine in the Prevention of Postoperative Nausea and Vomiting

Abstract: Although reported in the aerospace literature and anecdotally by anesthesiologists, the putative antiemetic effect of ephedrine remains unquantitated. We therefore prospectively studied ephedrine as an antiemetic agent in the perioperative setting in 97 patients undergoing general anesthesia for outpatient gynecologic laparoscopy. Patients were assigned in a double-blind randomized fashion to receive a standardized general anesthetic followed by an intramuscular dose of either ephedrine (0.5 mg/kg), droperidol… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

2
9
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 72 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
2
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, it seems that both ephedrine and metoclopramide have a limited duration of action in the doses we used. This is in accordance with the study of Rothenberg et al ( 8), where they found a significant antiemetic effect of ephedrine during the recovery room phase of 76–96 min, whereas no protective effect was evident during the next 24 h. Also, metoclopramide has previously been shown to have a shortlasting antiemetic effect ( 9, 10). Whereas ondansetron has been shown to be effective as PONV prophylaxis for 24 h ( 11), all our patients rescued with ondansetron during the first 3 h experienced PONV during the subsequent 3–24 h period.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Thus, it seems that both ephedrine and metoclopramide have a limited duration of action in the doses we used. This is in accordance with the study of Rothenberg et al ( 8), where they found a significant antiemetic effect of ephedrine during the recovery room phase of 76–96 min, whereas no protective effect was evident during the next 24 h. Also, metoclopramide has previously been shown to have a shortlasting antiemetic effect ( 9, 10). Whereas ondansetron has been shown to be effective as PONV prophylaxis for 24 h ( 11), all our patients rescued with ondansetron during the first 3 h experienced PONV during the subsequent 3–24 h period.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…The benefits of a multimodal approach may also explain why only 8% of the ephedrine patients needed both metoclopramide and ondansetron for rescue, whereas 32% of the placebo patients needed this double rescue. Whereas metoclopramide is mostly a dopamine antagonist and ondansetron is a 5‐HT 3 antagonist ( 1), ephedrine has a sympatomimetic action which has been shown to be antiemetic ( 14), probably by counteracting emetic vagal stimuli ( 8).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Another mechanism involved in the prevention of esmolol-related PONV could be the excessive perioperative cardiovascular changes [13]. So the use of esmolol can mitigate such perioperative hemodynamic changes and prevent PONV [14,15].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%