2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0004-9514(14)60165-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficacy of electrical stimulation in preventing or reducing subluxation of the shoulder after stroke: A meta-analysis

Abstract: After stroke, up to 81% of individuals develop shoulder subluxation, a condition frequently associated with poor upper limb function. Recently, electrical stimulation has been applied to shoulder muscles to treat shoulder subluxation. The purpose of this meta-analysis was to examine the efficacy of surface electrical stimulation for the prevention or reduction of shoulder subluxation after stroke. A meta-analysis of all eligible randomised or quasi-randomised trials of electrical stimulation for the treatment … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

3
77
1
9

Year Published

2005
2005
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 104 publications
(93 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
3
77
1
9
Order By: Relevance
“…Kobayashi, Onishi, Ihashi, Yagi, and Handa (1999) found electrical stimulation to be effective in reducing subluxation when applied to the supraspinatus and the middle deltoid for 15 min twice a day for 6 wk. However, a meta-analysis by Ada and Foongchomcheay (2002) concluded that although evidence supports the use of electrical stimulation to prevent subluxation early after a stroke, little evidence supports using electrical stimulation late after a stroke.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kobayashi, Onishi, Ihashi, Yagi, and Handa (1999) found electrical stimulation to be effective in reducing subluxation when applied to the supraspinatus and the middle deltoid for 15 min twice a day for 6 wk. However, a meta-analysis by Ada and Foongchomcheay (2002) concluded that although evidence supports the use of electrical stimulation to prevent subluxation early after a stroke, little evidence supports using electrical stimulation late after a stroke.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…34,35 We recruited participants early after stroke but found no benefit. Previous studies predominantly recruited participants months or even years after stroke and therefore may have treated the late complications of stroke rather than influenced recovery.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…[17] It has been suggested that NMES application to the aforementioned muscles prevents the subluxation prohibiting the inferior displacement of the humeral head. [22] Also, NMES affects agonist and antagonist muscles through local neuronal effects and spinal cord pathways. In the present study, the patients were assessed within 12 months after stroke and, compared to the baseline, 20-session NMES treatment decreased shoulder subluxation.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%