Effectiveness of the California Tri-Pull Taping Method for Shoulder Subluxation Poststroke: A Single-Subject ABA Design

Hayner, Kate A

doi:10.5014/ajot.2012.004663

Cited by 18 publications

(46 citation statements)

References 38 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…We believe that this is the first double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled clinical trial to examine the effects of KT on HSP by using ultrasonography. Two previous studies have assessed the effects of taping on post-stroke shoulder subluxation (46,57). These studies applied physical examination to assess the degree of shoulder subluxation.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effects of Kinesio taping for stroke patients with hemiplegic shoulder pain: A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study

Huang¹,

Chang²,

Liou³

et al. 2017

J Rehabil Med

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: To investigate the effects of Kinesio taping for stroke patients with hemiplegic shoulder pain. Design: Double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial. Subjects: Twenty-one stroke patients with hemiplegic shoulder pain within 6 months of stroke onset in the rehabilitation ward of a medical university hospital in Taiwan. Methods: A 3-week intervention involving a conventional rehabilitation protocol and therapeutic Kinesio taping was conducted with an experimental group of 11 stroke patients. A control group of 10 stroke patients underwent an identical conventional rehabilitation programme and sham Kinesio taping on the hemiplegic shoulder. Numerical rating scale scores, Shoulder Pain and Disability Index, ultrasound findings and pain-free passive range of motion of the affected shoulder, were evaluated before and after the intervention. Mann-Whitney test was used to compare within-group continuous variables before and after the intervention. Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to analyse the differences and changes in values between study and control groups. Results: There was no statistical difference in demographic variables between the 2 groups. Both groups showed improvement in passive range of motion of the shoulder, (mean numerical rating scale 2.36 (standard deviation (SD) 1.03)), and mean Shoulder Pain and Disability Index (16.64 (SD 2.62)) after the intervention (p < 0.001); however, no significant between-group differences were observed in the numerical rating scale score, pain-free passive ROM, and ultrasound findings for the shoulder after 3 weeks of treatment. Concerning the variables changes, the therapeutic Kinesio taping group showed more improvement in the numerical rating scale

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effects of Kinesio taping for stroke patients with hemiplegic shoulder pain: A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study

Huang¹,

Chang²,

Liou³

et al. 2017

J Rehabil Med

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…3). Strapping interventions were applied only to the gleno-humeral joint in five studies (Ancliffe, 1992;Griffin & Bernhardt, 2006;Hayner, 2012;Morin & Bravo, 1997;Pandian et al, 2013), and both the gleno-humeral joint and the scapula-thoracic joint (in part) in three studies (Appel, Mayston, & Perry, 2011;Hanger et al, 2000;Peters & Lee, 2003). Strapping interventions were developed in hospital clinical rehabilitation settings (Ancliffe, 1992;Hanger et al, 2000;Hayner, 2012) and/or were based Fig.…”

Section: Shoulder Strapping As An Interventionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…• Reduce subluxation (Appel et al, 2011;Hanger et al, 2000;Hayner, 2012;Morin & Bravo, 1997); • Improve joint alignment in the gleno-humeral joint and the scapula (Appel et al, 2011); • Reduce (Hanger et al, 2000;Hayner, 2012;Pandian et al, 2013;Peters & Lee, 2003) and delay the onset pain (Ancliffe, 1992;Griffin & Bernhardt, 2006); • Improve or maintain range of movement -active (Appel et al, 2011;Hayner, 2012;Peters & Lee, 2003), passive (Griffin & Bernhardt, 2006;Pandian et al, 2013;Peters & Lee, 2003) and pain-free movement (Hanger et al, 2000); • Improve speed and smoothness of movement (Appel et al, 2011); and • Prevent shoulder injuries (Pandian et al, 2013).…”

Section: Shoulder Strapping As An Interventionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…A range of different strapping products were used, applied either by the treating therapist (Griffin & Bernhardt, 2006;Hanger et al, 2000;Hayner, 2012), an alternative therapist, nurse or relative (Ancliffe, 1992;Appel et al, 2011;Pandian et al, 2013;Peters & Lee, 2003) or not stated (Morin & Bravo, 1997). Strapping was applied for durations ranging from five days (Morin & Bravo, 1997) to six weeks (Hanger et al, 2000), and re-applied every three to four days.…”

Section: Shoulder Strapping As An Interventionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In total, 340 participants were recruited, 292 of whom participated in randomised controlled trials. Of the 160 females and 180 males, 314 were recruited within four weeks of stroke onset (Ancliffe, 1992;Appel et al, 2011;Griffin & Bernhardt, 2006;Hanger et al, 2000;Pandian et al, 2013), and 26 at up to five years after stroke onset (Hayner, 2012;Morin & Bravo, 1997;Peters & Lee, 2003). In all bar one study (Appel et al, 2011), participants presented with complete paralysis or severe shoulder weakness (Appel et al, 2011).…”

Section: Study Characteristicsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 2 more Smart Citations

Shoulder strapping for stroke-related upper limb dysfunction and shoulder impairments: Systematic review

Appel

Perry

Jones

2014

NRE

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

BACKGROUND: Shoulder impairments are common after stroke, resulting in reduced upper limb function. Shoulder strapping may be beneficial as an adjunct to conventional therapy and warrants further investigation. OBJECTIVES: To determine i) the efficacy and ii) any adverse effects of shoulder strapping used to reduce stroke-related upper limb and shoulder impairments and to improve function. METHODS: Three reviewers independently searched CINAHL, Ovid MEDLINE, EMBASE, AMED and PEDro databases and extracted data. Results were synthesized using descriptive methods and meta-analysis and interpreted in relation to potential risk of bias. RESULTS: Eight studies met inclusion criteria, recruiting 340 stroke participants. Studies predominantly included people with shoulder paralysis and examined shoulder strapping within four weeks of stroke onset for outcomes of increased upper limb function, reduced subluxation and pain. Strapping interventions, outcomes and measures were diverse, some studies encountered high risk of bias and findings were generally inconclusive with some indication of benefit in terms of delaying onset of shoulder pain. CONCLUSIONS: There is insufficient evidence of efficacy or inefficacy with shoulder paralysis but shoulder strapping demonstrated minimal adverse effects and should be rigorously tested with shoulder paresis as well as paralysis after stroke.

show abstract

Testing a Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial of Therapeutic versus Placebo Shoulder Strapping as an Adjuvant Intervention Early after Stroke

Appel

Perry

Jones

2015

Occupation Therapy Intl

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study tested a protocol for a randomized controlled trial of therapeutic versus placebo shoulder strapping as an adjuvant intervention early after stroke. Despite widespread use, there is little evidence of the efficacy or acceptability of shoulder strapping to improve arm function in patients with shoulder paresis following stroke. This study tested a protocol designed to trial shoulder strapping as an adjuvant therapy in patients with shoulder paresis after stroke and tested its acceptability for patients and clinical staff. A multiple-method design comprised one quantitative randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study and two qualitative exploratory investigations entailing patient interviews and staff surveys. Seventeen sub-acute stroke patients with shoulder paresis were recruited in London stroke service settings between November 2007 and December 2009. Outcomes from a 4-week therapeutic strapping protocol were compared with those of placebo strapping as an adjunct to conventional rehabilitation. Minimal adverse events and greater improvement in arm function (Action Research Arm Test) were seen with therapeutic compared with placebo strapping (effect size 0.34). Patients and staff found the strapping acceptable with minimal adverse effects. This study provided data for sample size calculation and demonstrated a workable research protocol to investigate the efficacy of shoulder strapping as an adjuvant intervention to routine rehabilitation for stroke patients. Small-scale findings continue to flag the importance of investigating this topic. The protocol is recommended for a definitive trial of shoulder strapping as an adjuvant intervention.

show abstract

Effectiveness of the California Tri-Pull Taping Method for Shoulder Subluxation Poststroke: A Single-Subject ABA Design

Cited by 18 publications

References 38 publications

Effects of Kinesio taping for stroke patients with hemiplegic shoulder pain: A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study

Effects of Kinesio taping for stroke patients with hemiplegic shoulder pain: A double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled study

Shoulder strapping for stroke-related upper limb dysfunction and shoulder impairments: Systematic review

Testing a Protocol for a Randomized Controlled Trial of Therapeutic versus Placebo Shoulder Strapping as an Adjuvant Intervention Early after Stroke

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About