2010
DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2591.2010.01709.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficacy of different irrigants in the removal of calcium hydroxide from root canals

Abstract: None of the irrigants nor their respective combinations were able to completely remove the calcium hydroxide. Chelating agents such as citric acid and EDTA showed the best results. The combination of chelators and NaOCl did not result in significant improvement of calcium hydroxide removal.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

5
92
2
17

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 104 publications
(116 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
(111 reference statements)
5
92
2
17
Order By: Relevance
“…This is in agreement with results of the previous studies, which showed the presence of CH debris on the root canal walls, regardless of the removal technique (9,11,13,14).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This is in agreement with results of the previous studies, which showed the presence of CH debris on the root canal walls, regardless of the removal technique (9,11,13,14).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 83%
“…In a previous study, irrigation with 0.5% NaOCl without use of instruments had the worst results of CH removal compared to other endodontic irrigants inclusive 17% EDTA-T (12). Roding et al (13) using the master apical file and irrigation with different solutions showed that 20% EDTA performed significantly better than 1% NaOCl and water. The authors explain these results because NaOCl has limited ability to dissolve inorganic substances such as CH.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…11 The residues could also influence the adhesion of sealers to the root canal walls, 9,10 compromising the quality of the seal provided by the root filling. 24,25 The dressing can be removed by irrigating the canal with NaOCl, EDTA or citric acid 13,26,27 in conjunction with manual files, 13 passive ultrasonic irrigation, 6,15 sonic activation, 14 the CanalBrush system, 6 or rotary instruments. 17 In the present study, a paste of calcium hydroxide with propylene glycol was used.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Entretanto, para excluir qualquer interferência negativa entre medicamento e material obturador, e para garantir a qualidade da obturação, todos os resíduos de Ca(OH) 2 devem ser retirados das paredes do canal antes da obturação [4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11][12] .…”
Section: Introdução O Hidróxido De Cálcio [Ca(oh)unclassified