Efficacy of ceramic repair material on the bond strength of composite resin to zirconia ceramic

Kırmalı, Ömer; Kapdan, Arife; Harorlı, Osman Tolga; Barutçugil, Çağatay; Özarslan, Mehmet Mustafa

doi:10.3109/00016357.2014.946963

Cited by 17 publications

(32 citation statements)

References 21 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…ZP, Z‐Bond used as a cleansing agent in this study is comprised of a dicarboxylic monomer, pyromellitic dimethacrylate, a monocarboxylic (GDMAS) monomer, glycerol dimethacrylate‐succinate (GDMAS), 2‐hydroxyethyl methacrylate, bisphenol‐A glycidyl methacrylate, 10‐MDP, and ethyl alcohol. In the literature, there are very few studies that evaluated the performance of the ZP (Z‐Bond) on zirconia surfaces . ZP forms a carboxylate salt through ionization of carboxylic acids upon application on Y‐TZP surface .…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 76%

Influence of cleaning methods on bond strength to saliva contaminated zirconia

Irmak

Yaman

Orhan

et al. 2018

J Esthet Restor Dent

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective To evaluate the influence of saliva contamination and cleaning procedures on shear bond strength (SBS) of a self‐adhesive resin cement (SAC) to zirconia surfaces. Materials and Methods A total of 160 sandblasted zirconia blocks were randomly divided into eight groups as follows: No saliva contamination, no cleansing (NC‐NC); contamination with saliva, no cleansing (SC‐NC); no saliva contamination, cleansing with a zirconia primer (ZP; Z‐Bond, Danville Materials, Inc., S. Ramon, California) (NC‐ZP); contamination with saliva, cleansing with ZP (SC‐ZP); no saliva contamination, cleansing with hydrofluoric acid (HF; Ultradent Porcelain Etch; Ultradent Products, South Jordan, Utah) followed by cleansing with ZP (NC‐HF‐ZP); contamination with saliva, cleansing with HF followed by cleansing with ZP (SC‐HF‐ZP); cleansing with ZP, contamination with saliva, cleansing with ZP (ZP‐SC‐ZP); application of ZP, contamination with saliva, cleansing with HF followed by cleansing with ZP (ZP‐SC‐HF‐ZP). Cylindrical resin composite blocks were luted to the zirconia surfaces with SAC (Clearfil SA Cement Automix, Kuraray, Inc., Tokyo, Japan). Specimens were subjected to shear forces at a cross‐head speed of 0.5 mm/min. Data were analyzed with Analysis of Variance and Tukey tests (α = 0.05). Results The bond strength values to zirconia were significantly influenced by saliva contamination (P < .05). The SC‐NC group showed the lowest bond strength values (5.6 ± 1.4 MPa; P < .05). All cleansing or pretreatment agents improved the bond strengths when compared to noncleansing groups, NC‐NC and SC‐NC. Conclusion In situations where saliva contamination is deemed unavoidable, application of ZP after try‐in of the zirconia restoration could be beneficial for the accurate cementation. Clinical Significance During try‐in sessions of fixed dental prostheses, zirconia ceramic restoration may come into contact with saliva and surfaces should be cleansed to obtain an optimal surface for adhesion. Application of zirconia primer to the sandblasted zirconia surface is recommended whether the surface is contaminated with saliva or not.

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 76%

Influence of cleaning methods on bond strength to saliva contaminated zirconia

Irmak

Yaman

Orhan

et al. 2018

J Esthet Restor Dent

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…This high content of the double bonds for copolymerization with composite might contribute to higher long‐term efficacy of ZPP than AP observed in the current study. In the reported studies on ZPP effectiveness in terms of resin‐zirconia strength, ZPP was not light‐cured . However, Magne et al reported 24‐hour SBS of preheated Z100 composite resin as a cementing agent to zirconia using light‐polymerized 2‐layer ZPP.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…In a short‐term study on zirconia repair using ZPP, a higher SBS of two layers with light polymerization (30 MPa) compared to one layer with or without light polymerization (15 and 20 MPa, respectively) was demonstrated . In a similar study, when ZPP was used in one layer without light polymerization, SBS (14.92 MPa) was not found to be statistically different from the TBS method (17.26 MPa) …”

mentioning

confidence: 89%

“…These techniques are based on mechanical methods (e.g., grinding and air particle abrasion), chemical methods (e.g., 10‐methacryloyloxydecyl dihydrogen phosphate [MDP], 10‐MDP‐containing primers), or a combined approach (e.g., tribochemical silica coating with silane primer [TBS]) . Some authors have suggested TBS as the most effective composite repair protocol for chipped zirconia restorations . MDP‐based silane and bonding resin mix applied on silica‐coated zirconia have been shown to improve shear bond strength (SBS) of resin cement (9.07 MPa) .…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Influence of Primers and Additional Resin Layer on Zirconia Repair Bond Strength

Shafıei

Fattah

Kiomarsi

et al. 2019

Journal of Prosthodontics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Purpose To evaluate the influence of alloy/zirconia primer and 10‐methacryloyloxydecyl dihydrogen phosphate (MDP)‐containing resin layer treatments on the shear bond strength (SBS) of composite resin to zirconia after aging. Materials and Methods Sixty zirconia (Y‐TZP) blocks were air‐abraded (35‐µm Al2O3) and divided into 6 experimental groups (n = 10) in terms of primer/resin layer as follows: (1) control, without any primer or resin; (2) AP, Alloy Primer; (3) ZPP, Z‐Prime Plus; (4) PL/ZPP, Z‐Prime Plus with light polymerization; (5) AP+SEB, Alloy Primer along with light‐cured bonding resin of a self‐etch adhesive system (SE Bond); and (6) ZPP+SEB, Z‐Prime Plus with SE Bond. After composite resin placement and light polymerization, the specimens were stored in distilled water (37°C for 4 months) and thermal‐cycled for 6000 cycles. The SBS was tested with a universal testing machine. Statistical analysis of the SBS data was performed with one‐way ANOVA, followed by HSD Tukey test (α = 0.05). Results There were significant differences between the groups (p < 0.001, F = 116.5). All the groups revealed significantly higher SBS than the control (p < 0.001). ZPP+SEB group exhibited the highest SBS (16.14 ± 2.52 MPa) and AP group the lowest SBS (7.00 ± 1.97 MPa) among experimental groups; both had significant differences with the other groups (p < 0.001). There were no significant differences between ZPP, PL/ZPP, and AP+SEB groups (p > 0.05). Conclusions The bond strength between zirconia ceramic and composite resin was affected by different primers/resin layer. Applying an MDP‐containing resin layer along with both primers resulted in significant enhancement of SBS. This improvement for Z‐Prime Plus was significantly higher than that of Alloy Primer.

show abstract

“…13,19,23 Yüzey aşındırması genel olarak kumlamanın yapılamadığı ağız içi işlemlerde tercih edilmesi gereken bir yöntem olarak bildirilmiştir. 19,24,25 Bununla birlikte, frez ile aşındırma sonrasında, zirkonyada oluşacak faz değişikliği sonucu zirkonyanın bükülme dayanımında düşüş olduğu ve kırılmalara karşı dayanıksız hale geldiği bildirilmiştir.…”

unclassified