2003
DOI: 10.1097/01.brs.0000083141.02027.48
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficacy of Autologous Growth Factors in Lumbar Intertransverse Fusions

Abstract: In this study, the use of AGF resulted in inferior rates of arthrodesis compared with autogenous bone graft alone. Although it is important to note there are several techniques available to produce AGF and that the concentration of AGF may differ between individuals, based on the authors' findings, they cannot recommend the use of AGF for this indication until further clinical studies, perhaps altering these variables, prove otherwise.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

4
86
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 120 publications
(90 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
4
86
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When the analysis of the cage filled with autograft (with or without autologous platelet concentrate) was made by CT, it was observed a quicker fusion in those patients with autologous platelet concentrate added, although the result, at the end of the follow-up, was the same [12]. It is true some authors emphasize on its goodness for lumbar arthrodesis [4,6] but our results agree with those from literature and we can claim, as a rule, that we get less fusion rates when adding autologous platelet concentrate to autograft or autograft plus TCP/HA [5,17,24,26,30]. So far, all clinical reports are case studies and we did not find level-1 data to support the use of autologous platelet concentrate in spinal fusion [1].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…When the analysis of the cage filled with autograft (with or without autologous platelet concentrate) was made by CT, it was observed a quicker fusion in those patients with autologous platelet concentrate added, although the result, at the end of the follow-up, was the same [12]. It is true some authors emphasize on its goodness for lumbar arthrodesis [4,6] but our results agree with those from literature and we can claim, as a rule, that we get less fusion rates when adding autologous platelet concentrate to autograft or autograft plus TCP/HA [5,17,24,26,30]. So far, all clinical reports are case studies and we did not find level-1 data to support the use of autologous platelet concentrate in spinal fusion [1].…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 82%
“…19 PRP has also been used in plantar fasciitis, spinal fusion, and in total knee arthroplasty with varying degrees of success. 4,5,7,11,27 PRP accelerated wound healing of human skin punch wounds in a recent prospective, controlled study. 13 The mechanisms by which PRP may work, however, have not been elucidated.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In some studies, PRP has been shown to decrease spine fusion rates. 7,27 Also, PRP in animal studies inhibits demineralized bone matrixmediated bone formation. 22 PRP may, however, help initiate, enhance, or accelerate soft tissue healing.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The AGF is a modified hemoconcentrator that requires PRP be prepared using a cell salvage device for further PRP concentration. Nevertheless, in some papers, the effect of applying concentrated PRP to tissues to increase growth factor delivery revealed no effect (Lowery et al 1999, Weiner and Walker 2003, Castro 2004, Carreon et al 2005. To account for the device differences in preparation volume, and therefore PRP volume, we calculated the total amount of growth factors rather than measuring the individual concentrations of PDGF-AB and TGF-b.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%