2020
DOI: 10.1097/ico.0000000000002414
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficacy of a Novel Ophthalmic Antimicrobial Drug Combination Toward a Large Panel of Staphylococcus aureus Clinical Ocular Isolates From Around the World

Abstract: Purpose: Staphylococcus aureus is a leading cause of keratitis requiring urgent antimicrobial treatment. However, rising antibiotic resistance has rendered current ophthalmic antibiotics increasingly ineffective. First, a diverse, ocular S. aureus strain set was evaluated for resistance to six commonly used ophthalmic antibiotics. Next, a recently discovered antimicrobial drug combination containing polymyxin B/trimethoprim + rifampin that displayed impressive efficacy towards S. aureus in both in vitro and in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

5
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One hundred and thirteen (69%) were classified as methicillin-sensitive (MSSA) while 50 strains (31%) were classified as methicillinresistant (MRSA). Multi-drug resistance, as defined by resistance to 3 or more classes of antibiotics, was previously determined to be 24% among the ocular isolates in this study [47].…”
Section: Statisticsmentioning
confidence: 78%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…One hundred and thirteen (69%) were classified as methicillin-sensitive (MSSA) while 50 strains (31%) were classified as methicillinresistant (MRSA). Multi-drug resistance, as defined by resistance to 3 or more classes of antibiotics, was previously determined to be 24% among the ocular isolates in this study [47].…”
Section: Statisticsmentioning
confidence: 78%
“…). A detailed description of this strain set has been previously published [47], and its core characteristics are presented in Table 1. The majority of isolates were collected from North America (n = 110, 67%), followed by Europe (n = 30, 18%), South America (n = 9, 6%), Middle East (n = 9, 6%), Asia (n = 3, 2%) and Africa (n = 2, 1%).…”
Section: Statisticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…IHMA70, an ocular isolate that encodes enterotoxins sed, sej, sek, seq, and ser , and IHMA104, an ocular isolate that is devoid of enterotoxins, were purchased from International Healthcare Management Associates (Schaumburg, IL, USA) and are part of a larger strain collection described previously. 17 Comparator non-ocular strains NE1809 (USA300Δ selX ) and NE1787 (USA300Δ srtA ) were obtained from the Nebraska Transposon Library. 43 Overnight cultures were prepared by inoculation of a single colony into 5 mL brain-heart infusion (BHI) broth (Becton Dickenson, Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA) and incubated overnight (37°C, 200 rpm).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As a first step, the MICs of a panel of commonly used ophthalmic antimicrobial drugs (9 antibiotics: vancomycin, gentamicin, moxifloxacin, polymyxin B-trimethoprim, erythromycin, tobramycin, ceftazidime, cefazolin, and rifampin; 3 antifungals: natamycin, amphotericin B, and voriconazole; and 2 antiacanthamoeba agents: chlorhexidine and PHMB) were determined for both S. aureus and P. aeruginosa (Table 1). Of note, while rifampin is not currently used in ophthalmic practice, it has been recently shown to significantly improve the activity of polymyxin B/trimethoprim when used in combination and may represent a novel keratitis therapeutic, [23][24][25][26] thus was included for further study. Among antibiotics, S. aureus was found to be sensitive to cefazolin (MIC = 1.08 6 0.520 mg mL 21 ), erythromycin (0.474 6 0.126 mg mL 21 ), gentamicin (1.21 6 0.555 mg mL 21 ), moxifloxacin (0.096 6 0.040 mg mL 21 ), polymyxin B/trimethoprim (1.43 6 0.452 mg mL 21 ), rifampin (0.0136 6 0.0037 mg mL 21 ), tobramycin (0.68 6 0.680 mg mL 21 ), and vancomycin (0.962 6 0.329 mg mL 21 Regarding the antifungal agents amphotericin B, natamycin, and voriconazole, none displayed antimicrobial activity when tested individually against either S. aureus or P. aeruginosa.…”
Section: Minimum Inhibitory Concentrationsmentioning
confidence: 99%