2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.vetmic.2017.01.012
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficacy evaluation of the C-strain-based vaccines against the subgenotype 2.1d classical swine fever virus emerging in China

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
25
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite vaccine control strategies using the C-strain, a vaccine developed by serial passage in rabbits that led to its attenuation and that has been used as an effective vaccine against CSFV, the disease has continued to be endemic in several countries. Recently, in China, the emergence of subgenotype 2.1d occurred, causing mild pathological and histological lesions in C-strain vaccinated swine, suggesting that although no clinical symptoms are observed, the C-strain would not provide pathological and virological protection against the emerging subgenotypes [3]. A similar occurrence has also been observed in Cuba, where selective pressure has resulted in escape mutants from vaccination with the C-strain.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 73%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Despite vaccine control strategies using the C-strain, a vaccine developed by serial passage in rabbits that led to its attenuation and that has been used as an effective vaccine against CSFV, the disease has continued to be endemic in several countries. Recently, in China, the emergence of subgenotype 2.1d occurred, causing mild pathological and histological lesions in C-strain vaccinated swine, suggesting that although no clinical symptoms are observed, the C-strain would not provide pathological and virological protection against the emerging subgenotypes [3]. A similar occurrence has also been observed in Cuba, where selective pressure has resulted in escape mutants from vaccination with the C-strain.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 73%
“…It is clear from these experiments that E2 residue substitutions that disrupt E2-SERTAD1 interactions in yeast two-hybrid appears to affect the ability of CSFV to replicate in cell cultures, particularly in primary swine macrophages. 104.16 (0.47) 3 1 All animals were IN inoculated with 10 5 TCID50 of the indicated virus. Animals were observed for 21 days after inoculation.…”
Section: Evaluation Of E2∆sertad1v In Virulence In Swinementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Nevertheless, development of new subunit vaccines remains a major area of research with the goal of fulfilling the following: early onset of protection with sterile immunity, long‐lasting immunity (the animal life cycle in the pork industry is about 7–8 months), safety without viral shedding among animals and low‐cost production. Importantly, subunit vaccines provide alternatives to protect pig populations against emerging subgenotypes for which current live attenuated CSFV vaccines are not highly protective, such as the emerging subgenotype 2.1d recently reported in India (Gong et al ., ) and south‐east Asia (Luo et al ., ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…According to many experimental challenge studies (Blome et al., ; Graham et al., ; Luo et al., ; Suradhat & Damrongwatanapokin, ), it is considered that vaccination drastically reduces clinical manifestations, irrespective of the genotype of the challenge strains. However, in contrast to that observed with genotype 1, prolonged viremia was common in vaccinated pigs infected with genotype 2 CSFV strains (Blome et al., ; Luo et al., ); furthermore, faecal shedding and histopathological lesions were identified in pigs challenged with a Chinese EEN strain, although clinical signs of infection were absent. A positive correlation between transmission risk and the genetic distance between previous immunization viruses and the challenge virus has been demonstrated for the influenza virus (Park et al., ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%