2018
DOI: 10.1111/tbed.12798
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Genetic evolution of classical swine fever virus under immune environments conditioned by genotype 1-based modified live virus vaccine

Abstract: Modified live vaccines (MLVs) based on genotype 1 strains, particularly C-strain, have been used to prevent and control classical swine fever virus (CSFV) worldwide. Nevertheless, a shift in the predominant CSFV strains circulating in the field from genotype 1 or 3 to genotype 2 is seen. Genotype 2 is genetically distant from the vaccine strains and was recently reported during outbreaks after vaccine failure; this has raised concerns that vaccination has influenced viral evolution. In Korea in 2016, there was… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
39
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 47 publications
(65 reference statements)
0
39
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Antigenic variations among various genotypes of CSFVs certainly render the currently available vaccines more effective in neutralizing historical viruses, while allowing the newly invading virus to escape. This hypothesis has been amply addressed in several previous studies [20][21][22][23]. The neutralizing antibodies of co-infected with Ab pigs against the LPC/AHRI strain were higher than those against the TD/96 strain and the 94.4 strain.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Antigenic variations among various genotypes of CSFVs certainly render the currently available vaccines more effective in neutralizing historical viruses, while allowing the newly invading virus to escape. This hypothesis has been amply addressed in several previous studies [20][21][22][23]. The neutralizing antibodies of co-infected with Ab pigs against the LPC/AHRI strain were higher than those against the TD/96 strain and the 94.4 strain.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…These events in the case of vaccines used in veterinary medicine are particularly significant because they may alter the cell tropism and host range of viruses, thus increasing the possibilities of their zoonotic transmission into humans (Schat and Baranowski, 2007). Evidence of vaccination-induced DNA and RNA virus evolution is increasing, and it has been documented with bovine respiratory syncytial virus, bovine herpesvirus-1, Marek's disease virus, porcine circovirus 2, and classical swine fever virus, among others [(Valarcher et al, 2000;Muylkens et al, 2006;Ji et al, 2014;Kekarainen et al, 2014;Constans et al, 2015;Yoo et al, 2018); reviews in Gandon et al, 2003;Schat and Baranowski, 2007)]. The timing of dominance of CTL-escape mutants of the simian immunodeficiency virus (SIV) was influenced by vaccination, and the process could be analyzed by penetration into the mutant spectra of the relevant viral populations (Loh et al, 2008).…”
Section: Vaccination-induced Evolutionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Consequently, the evolution of viral population into vaccine-escaping directions such as emergence of immune escaping mutants and change of dominant viral genotype occurs. Those phenomena have been observed both in avian virus [ 73 74 75 ] and SIVs [ 76 77 ] as well as in other viruses of industrial animals [ 78 79 80 81 ]. Incomplete vaccine coverage commonly observed in the fields also can be a critical contributor accelerating the evolution [ 82 ].…”
Section: Considerations To Be Successful Vaccinationmentioning
confidence: 99%