2008
DOI: 10.1007/s11109-008-9076-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficacy, Emotions and the Habit of Participation

Abstract: Political behavior is triggered by the presence of a variety of material and cognitive resources, including political efficacy. The dominant view conceptualizes efficacy as capital, used to overcome obstacles to participation. Our theory suggests that unlike other resources, efficacy aids in the development of habitual participation by activating a particular negative emotion, anger. Using the 1990-1992 NES Panel, we find that internal efficacy boosts participation in part by facilitating anger, but not fear, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
140
0
11

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 271 publications
(167 citation statements)
references
References 42 publications
6
140
0
11
Order By: Relevance
“…Emotions have a substantial impact on political attitudes (e.g., Banks and Valentino 2012;Hatemi et al 2013) and behaviors (e.g., Brader et al 2008;Brader 2005;Marcus et al 2000;Panagopoulos 2011;Valentino et al 2011), and help to solve collective action problems in political participation (Groenendyk 2011;Valentino et al 2008). A growing body of research in political science and psychology demonstrates that discrete emotions, such as anger, fear, and anxiety, have distinct effects on political outcomes.…”
Section: State and Trait Emotions In Political Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Emotions have a substantial impact on political attitudes (e.g., Banks and Valentino 2012;Hatemi et al 2013) and behaviors (e.g., Brader et al 2008;Brader 2005;Marcus et al 2000;Panagopoulos 2011;Valentino et al 2011), and help to solve collective action problems in political participation (Groenendyk 2011;Valentino et al 2008). A growing body of research in political science and psychology demonstrates that discrete emotions, such as anger, fear, and anxiety, have distinct effects on political outcomes.…”
Section: State and Trait Emotions In Political Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For, even if one does subscribe to the above critiques of voice/agency, these critiques are not universally applicable. Indeed, there is nothing of necessity wrong with using emotion as a way to highlight how, for instance, anger might be a key driver to children's engagement in decision-making (Valentino et al, 2009). …”
Section: Going Beyond 'Voice' And/or (Independent) 'Agency'?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They posit that such correlations across time may have at least five different potential causes: (i) increased campaign activity focused on previous voters, (ii) alterations in individuals' broad political orientations, (iii) increased positive attitudes towards the act of voting, (iv) lowering informational barriers to the act of voting, and (v) alterations in individual self-conceptualizations to encompass regular voting as part of self-image. Other scholarly work on this question has primarily placed the development of regular voting patterns as a result of one or all of these related factors (see also Fowler 2006;Kanazawa 2000;Valentino et al 2009). Despite this movement toward empirical demonstrations of habit, the inability to settle on the reason for repeated behavior has left the theory of habitual turnout undeveloped.…”
Section: Variables Shaping Turnout and Habit: Repeated Behaviormentioning
confidence: 99%