2022
DOI: 10.21037/tp-22-68
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficacy and safety of mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) pulpotomy for caries-exposed permanent teeth in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Abstract: Background: This study aimed to evaluate the effect of mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) pulp capping for caries-exposed permanent teeth. However, the efficacy of MTA in the treatment of children's gums is still controversial, and different studies have shown different efficacy. Therefore, it is necessary to systematically

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3
1

Relationship

1
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This conclusion supports the rejection of the null hypothesis. These findings are consistent with previous systematic reviews that have demonstrated better results for pulpotomies in permanent teeth using MTA in comparison to calcium hydroxide (Ather et al, 2022; Li et al, 2019; Wang et al, 2022). The results showed no significant difference when comparing MTA with CEM or Biodentine, with similar success rates.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…This conclusion supports the rejection of the null hypothesis. These findings are consistent with previous systematic reviews that have demonstrated better results for pulpotomies in permanent teeth using MTA in comparison to calcium hydroxide (Ather et al, 2022; Li et al, 2019; Wang et al, 2022). The results showed no significant difference when comparing MTA with CEM or Biodentine, with similar success rates.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Recently, we found that some of the included articles were unqualified in our article entitled “Efficacy and safety of mineral trioxide aggregate (MTA) pulpotomy for caries-exposed permanent teeth in children: a systematic review and meta-analysis” ( 1 ) published in Vol 11, No 4 (April 2022) issue of Translational Pediatrics ( TP ). In order to correct this serious mistake, after discussion, we request that this article be retracted.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…New searches on PubMed using the same search strategies as in Study I (Table 1), including studies published between 2013 and 2021, revealed no study answering the research question comparing pulp capping procedures with root canal treatment. Instead, recent research seems to have shifted towards advocating full pulpotomy with MTA instead of partial pulpotomy (Wang et al 2022) which means that an update of the systematic review in Study I would no longer be relevant if it did not also include full pulpotomy.…”
Section: Study I -Systematic Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%