2010
DOI: 10.3174/ajnr.a2296
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Efficacy and Safety of Ethanol Ablation for Thyroglossal Duct Cysts

Abstract: BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE:TGDC is a common congenital neck lesion, which has been treated by surgery. Although surgery is curative, it has drawbacks such as scars and surgical morbidity. Therefore, we applied EA as an alternative treatment technique. The purpose of this study was the evaluation of the efficacy and safety of EA for TGDC.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
55
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
3
55
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, EA may be the first-line treatment modality for cystic thyroid nodules, which has comparable therapeutic efficacy to, but is less expensive than, RF ablation. of the internal fluid was performed by using normal saline, which is known to be an effective method for treating viscous cystic nodules (1,4,23). Using these techniques, the volume reduction was excellent in both of our study patient groups, although the volume reduction of EA was still seen to be superior to that of RF ablation.…”
Section: Vascular and Interventional Radiology: Ethanol Versus Rf Ablmentioning
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Therefore, EA may be the first-line treatment modality for cystic thyroid nodules, which has comparable therapeutic efficacy to, but is less expensive than, RF ablation. of the internal fluid was performed by using normal saline, which is known to be an effective method for treating viscous cystic nodules (1,4,23). Using these techniques, the volume reduction was excellent in both of our study patient groups, although the volume reduction of EA was still seen to be superior to that of RF ablation.…”
Section: Vascular and Interventional Radiology: Ethanol Versus Rf Ablmentioning
confidence: 91%
“…The secondary end points for the clinical outcomes included the binary therapeutic success rate, which was defined as the proportion of patients who showed a volume reduction of greater than 50% (1,15,23), improvement of symptoms and cosmetic problems, and the number of major complications. Major and minor complications were defined by the definitions of the Society of Interventional Radiology (25,26).…”
Section: Patientsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After skin sterilisation and anaesthesia with 2% lidocaine at the puncture site, a 14-to 18-gauge needle was inserted into the nodule under ultrasound guidance via the trans-isthmic approach, thus preventing a change in the position of the needle tip and of ethanol leakage while swallowing [13,14,17,18,[21][22][23][24][25]. The maximum volume of internal fluid was aspirated, residual debris or colloid was removed by saline irrigation [20], and 99% ethanol was injected slowly into the cystic space. The volume of injected ethanol usually corresponded to about 50% of the volume of aspirated fluid.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At enrolment, patients were asked to rate their symptom score on a 10-cm visual analogue scale (0-10). Physicians recorded a cosmetic grade (1, no palpable mass; 2, a palpable mass but no cosmetic problem; 3, cosmetic problem on swallowing only; 4, readily detected cosmetic problem) [20][21][22][23].…”
Section: Patient Enrolmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The 3 orthogonal diameters of each nodule (the largest diameter and the 2 diameters perpendicular to it) were measured, and the volume of each nodule was calculated by using the following equation: V ϭ abc / 6, where V is volume, a is the largest diameter, and b and c are the 2 perpendicular diameters. 8,13,24 Under US guidance, 1 of the 2 radiologists performed fine-needle aspiration on the solid component of each nodule. At enrollment, the patients were asked to rate their symptom score on a 10-cm Visual Analog Scale (0 -10).…”
Section: Preablation Assessmentmentioning
confidence: 99%