2014
DOI: 10.1179/1756750514z.00000000054
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

EFFESUS Methodology for Assessing the Impacts of Energy-Related Retrofit Measures on Heritage Significance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
41
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Beyond the UK, international studies like the Energy Efficiency for EU Historic Districts' Sustainability (EFFESUS) project recognize that improving energy performance in historic buildings is a balancing act between building preservation and the installation of retrofit measures [31] but most projects are focused more on the decision-making process than human-centered approach. On the other hand, some researchers such as López and Frontini [32] argue that heritage value should give way to photovoltaic installations since ground space is limited for building new, energyefficient dwellings, and they develop a model for multi-stakeholder decision making in requests to install photovoltaic cells on heritage buildings.…”
Section: Research Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Beyond the UK, international studies like the Energy Efficiency for EU Historic Districts' Sustainability (EFFESUS) project recognize that improving energy performance in historic buildings is a balancing act between building preservation and the installation of retrofit measures [31] but most projects are focused more on the decision-making process than human-centered approach. On the other hand, some researchers such as López and Frontini [32] argue that heritage value should give way to photovoltaic installations since ground space is limited for building new, energyefficient dwellings, and they develop a model for multi-stakeholder decision making in requests to install photovoltaic cells on heritage buildings.…”
Section: Research Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, no method was identified that can tailor sustainable interventions on buildings' façades, although in HBs the front walls are often representatives of much of the aesthetic and architectural value and constantly exposed to climate and anthropic-induced decay. The majority of the methods (60%, i.e., n = 29) (e.g., [44,47]) were applied to single (as a whole) buildings while the rest (40%, i.e., n = 19) to interventions at district level (e.g., [34,49]) (see Figure 6a). Regarding the occupancy of the building, about 33% focus on residential buildings (n = 16, e.g., [48,50]), 17% on religious buildings (n = 8, e.g., [45,51]), 10% on educational buildings (n = 5, e.g., [24,25]), 8% on museums (n = 4, e.g., [31,32,46]) etc.…”
Section: Further Findingsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Energy upgrading of historic buildings is not only a cultural issue but also important in terms of global environmental objectives in Europe since over 40% of the European housing stock was built before 1960 [5]. The Housing Statistics in the EU show that 24% of residential buildings of the European building stock are pre 1945 [6] and that a significant percentage have some kind of heritage significance [7], requiring specific solutions to conserve and promote these values.…”
Section: There Is a Close Relation Between Liveability And Energy Effmentioning
confidence: 99%