2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.jbusvent.2008.02.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effectual versus predictive logics in entrepreneurial decision-making: Differences between experts and novices

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

23
428
2
25

Year Published

2010
2010
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 599 publications
(518 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
23
428
2
25
Order By: Relevance
“…Sarasvathy (2001a) defines these concepts in the following way: first, the process of causation begins with a predefined goal and concentrates on the selection of various resources to achieve that goal; second, the process of effectuation begins with the set of basic resources that can be controlled and focuses on the generation of one or some possible outcomes that those resources allow. Sarasvathy (2001b) sought to identify how experienced entrepreneurs and MBA students reacted to the hypothetical problem of starting a business by responding to five questions (a topic further explored in Sarasvathy 2008;Dew et al 2009Dew et al , 2011. Sarasvathy (2001b) selected twenty-seven entrepreneurs she considered experts.…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sarasvathy (2001a) defines these concepts in the following way: first, the process of causation begins with a predefined goal and concentrates on the selection of various resources to achieve that goal; second, the process of effectuation begins with the set of basic resources that can be controlled and focuses on the generation of one or some possible outcomes that those resources allow. Sarasvathy (2001b) sought to identify how experienced entrepreneurs and MBA students reacted to the hypothetical problem of starting a business by responding to five questions (a topic further explored in Sarasvathy 2008;Dew et al 2009Dew et al , 2011. Sarasvathy (2001b) selected twenty-seven entrepreneurs she considered experts.…”
Section: Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As the theoretical foundation for these findings, Dew et al (2009) draw on the literature on expert versus novice decision-making. They point out that experts are more likely to use analogical rather than analytical decision-making (Sloman 1996), think in a more holistic and conceptual way, and weigh predictive information more critically.…”
Section: H2amentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Пред-приниматели-эксперты более склонны при-менять эффектуационную логику, посколь-ку они склонны думать эвристически и использовать аналоговое, а не аналитиче-ское мышление [Dew et al, 2009;Wright, Stigliani, 2013]. В то же время одного на-личия опыта недостаточно для того, чтобы называться экспертом.…”
Section: теория и гипотезы исследованияunclassified
“…Эти ценности согласуются с основ-ными принципами эффектуации, которая строится на постулатах построения отно-шений с клиентами и партнерами, совмест-ного создания ценности и формирования связей [Sarasvathy, 2001]. Создание парт-нерств и альянсов позволяет предприни-мателям контролировать непредвиденные события и реагировать на неожиданные изменения с большим набором возмож-ностей и ресурсов [Dew et al, 2009]. Ори-ентация общества на ценности принад-лежности, равноправия и гармонии может способствовать развитию у предпринима-телей эффектуационной когнитивной ло-гики, поскольку ее принципы действия соответствуют указанным ценностям.…”
Section: национальная культура и логика принятия предпринимательскихunclassified