2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0304-3940(03)00385-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of working memory demands on frontal slow waves in time-interval reproduction tasks in humans

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

3
15
0
2

Year Published

2004
2004
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
3
15
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, this difference was more prominent at frontal and central electrode sites between 500 and 1500 ms after the offset of S1. The spatial distribution of these slow waves was similar to that reported in other ERP/EEG studies of duration information processing (e.g., Monfort, et al, 2000;Monfort & Pouthas, 2003;Schubotz & Friederici, 1997) and the polarity and the magnitude of the amplitude difference were comparable to those reported by Monfort and Pouthas (2003) in their Gap trial modification of the standard S1-S2 paradigm.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Moreover, this difference was more prominent at frontal and central electrode sites between 500 and 1500 ms after the offset of S1. The spatial distribution of these slow waves was similar to that reported in other ERP/EEG studies of duration information processing (e.g., Monfort, et al, 2000;Monfort & Pouthas, 2003;Schubotz & Friederici, 1997) and the polarity and the magnitude of the amplitude difference were comparable to those reported by Monfort and Pouthas (2003) in their Gap trial modification of the standard S1-S2 paradigm.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…In this paradigm, S1 and S2 durations of either the same or different magnitude, are presented successively with an interleaved retention delay (e.g., Schubotz & Friederici, 1997;Hälbig et al, 1998;Monfort & Pouthas, 2003;Schubotz & Friederici, 1997;). Therefore, SW amplitude differences during the retention ISSN 1303 5150 www.neuroquantology.com interval for different duration S1 stimuli would suggest differential memory demands.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…This finding is compatible with the idea that the CNV amplitude reflects the accumulation of time information, probably pulses if one refers to the pacemaker-counter device described earlier, with more counted pulses resulting in larger CNV amplitude. In brief, additional findings based on CNV indicate that frontal regions play a critical role in the accumulation of temporal information (Pfeuty, Ragot, & Pouthas, 2003b), during the building of an interval memory trace (Pfeuty, Ragot, & Pouthas, 2003a), and during the retention of temporal information (Monfort & Pouthas, 2003; see also .…”
Section: Cerebellummentioning
confidence: 98%