2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2016.08.027
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of water quality on inactivation and repair of Microcystis viridis and Tetraselmis suecica following medium-pressure UV irradiation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(1)). Different studies found that a high salt concentration may affect the osmotic forces and make the enteric and freshwater organisms less vulnerable to the UV irradiation, whereas marine organisms are not affected . However, the loss of the inactivating efficacy of Escherichia coli (ATCC 11229) treatment due to the salinity is lower in the case of the single‐pass device .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…(1)). Different studies found that a high salt concentration may affect the osmotic forces and make the enteric and freshwater organisms less vulnerable to the UV irradiation, whereas marine organisms are not affected . However, the loss of the inactivating efficacy of Escherichia coli (ATCC 11229) treatment due to the salinity is lower in the case of the single‐pass device .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Different studies found that a high salt concentration may affect the osmotic forces and make the enteric and freshwater organisms less vulnerable to the UV irradiation, [53][54][55][56] whereas marine organisms are not affected. 57 However, the loss of the inactivating efficacy of Escherichia coli (ATCC 11229) treatment due to the salinity is lower in the case of the single-pass device. 30 In this sense, treatment with the recirculation device, based on the repetitive application of short doses, promotes the resistance of the organisms to the UV irradiation.…”
Section: Inactivation Of Escherichia Coli (Atcc 11229) and Natural Pomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To date, a number of treatment processes have been developed to alleviate or remove algal cells from surface water. Broadly, the prevailing methods can be categorized as: (a) physical processes, such as dissolved air floatation (DAF), direct media filtration and membrane filtration [10]; (b) chemical process (both inorganic and organic), such as coagulation/flocculation and pre-oxidation (using chlorine, ozone, permanganate), EOM as flocculation aid [11]; and lastly, (c) electromagnetic irradiation, such as UV irradiated disinfection [12] and ultrasonic irradiation assisted algae removal [13]. However, from the aspect of economic limitations and practical implications, chemical processes have been used conventionally to treat algae enriched water.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recently, sequential filtration and inactivation process has been recommended as the main technology for ballast water treatment [5]. Among various inactivation processes, ultraviolet (UV) radiation and electrolysis are two excellent technologies [6,7]. UV radiation is a wildly used disinfection technology with high efficiency and safety.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%