2003
DOI: 10.3923/pjbs.2003.1151.1155
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Water-Logging on Juice Quality and Yield of Sugarcane

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Recoverable sugar was significantly unaffected by waterlogging in both locations. This also coincided with the findings of Hasan et al (2003), which showed that flooding event during growth has a negligible effect on juice quality at harvest. Gomathi et al (2014) also note that sugarcane cultivars are fairly tolerant to waterlogging at 5-9 MAP.…”
Section: Statement On Conflict Of Interestsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…Recoverable sugar was significantly unaffected by waterlogging in both locations. This also coincided with the findings of Hasan et al (2003), which showed that flooding event during growth has a negligible effect on juice quality at harvest. Gomathi et al (2014) also note that sugarcane cultivars are fairly tolerant to waterlogging at 5-9 MAP.…”
Section: Statement On Conflict Of Interestsupporting
confidence: 90%
“…After flooding having been stopped, Co 527 decays sooner than Co 419 and Co 449 [ 3 ). Furthermore, sugarcane genotypes Isd-20, I-93/93, and I-8/95 exhibit no significant difference in sugar recovery yield in normal and waterlogged conditions, although juice quality gets slightly better in water logged situations than in normal conditions [45] . Under waterlogging conditions, activities of carbohydrate metabolism enzymes and acidic and neutral invertase enzymes increase significantly, whereas the enzymatic activity of amylase decreases only slightly [81] , contributing to low sugar recovery and poor juice quality.…”
Section: Secondary Lossesmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…These results are similar to those found by Tavares et al (2017a) when they conducted similar studies with cane-plant. Hasan et al (2003) evaluated the growth and yield of sugarcane cultivars under soils flooding conditions and concluded that due to the genetic potentiality of some cultivars tested, they presented similar performance to normal cultivation in terms of quality, yield and growth. Tavares et al [20] worked with sugarcane-plant and also found that the biomass, yield and quality of sugarcane plants in flooded soil was similar to normal cultivation conditions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%