2020
DOI: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_634_19
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of virtual and lecture-based instruction on learning, content retention, and satisfaction from these instruction methods among surgical technology students: A comparative study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Similar to our previous findings, 11,14 Abarghouie, et al, 44 found that when 40 surgical technology students were randomly assigned to virtual or traditional (lecture-based, in-person) teaching formats, the short-term learning outcomes were nearly identical for both formats. However, in contrast to our findings here, their longer-term examination scores illustrated significant differences in content retention and recall performance, favoring virtual instruction.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Similar to our previous findings, 11,14 Abarghouie, et al, 44 found that when 40 surgical technology students were randomly assigned to virtual or traditional (lecture-based, in-person) teaching formats, the short-term learning outcomes were nearly identical for both formats. However, in contrast to our findings here, their longer-term examination scores illustrated significant differences in content retention and recall performance, favoring virtual instruction.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Independent of delivery format, it is important to pursue understanding of the longer-term contribution of physician leadership development approaches to skills acquisition and use, particularly when it comes to the more nuanced skills involved in equity-centered leadership. 2 While there are several research publications providing evidence of efficacy, 2 such as the systemic reviews of leadership programs by Frich et al 5 in 2015 and later by Gerts 6 et al, in 2020, there is relatively less understanding of the continuing impact on knowledge and skills many months 8 or even years [27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][45] after the training. While the findings of Abarghouie, et al, 44 reported that virtually delivered instruction had a stronger impact on Journal of Healthcare Leadership 2024:16 https://doi.org/10.2147/JHL.S455105 DovePress 249 longer-term content retention and recall performance, our own findings showed very similar outcomes between the two modalities.…”
Section: Dovepressmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Each university, faculty, and even discipline employs different forms of digital teaching. For example, more virtual reality applications are used in surgical and intensive care specialties [ 55 , 60 , 66 ]. Interestingly, in surgery, the classical main lecture was still considered quite important before the pandemic [ 29 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The G-Power software version 3.1 was used to calculate the sample size. According to a satisfaction variable (mean [SD]1 = 115.56 [17.57] and mean [SD]2 = 132.24 [17.92]) in a previous study (21) and considering α = 0.05, power = 80%, and t-test for differences between the 2 independent groups' mean, a large effect size, 2-tailed P value, and 1:1 allocation ratio, a 28-subject sample size was determined for the study.…”
Section: Sample Sizementioning
confidence: 99%