2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecoinf.2016.12.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of uncertain cost-surface specification on landscape connectivity measures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 45 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is important to note that even a species-agnostic approach will be parameterized with a certain group of species in mind, in this case terrestrial organisms 20,33 .Because large water bodies, despite being natural features, may disrupt the movement of many terrestrial organisms, some authors have treated them as a barrier 34 . The hydrological connectivity of aquatic habitats, on the other hand, should be modelled separately as it has a linear network structure.More generally, focal-species and species-agnostic approaches both are known to be sensitive to resistance values, which are often based on expert opinion, and a rigorous assessment of the sensitivity to parameter settings is required [35][36][37] . For instance, Koen et al 28 successfully validated a species-agnostic model of landscape connectivity with road mortality data of reptiles and amphibians and with molecular genetic data for a mammalian species.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…It is important to note that even a species-agnostic approach will be parameterized with a certain group of species in mind, in this case terrestrial organisms 20,33 .Because large water bodies, despite being natural features, may disrupt the movement of many terrestrial organisms, some authors have treated them as a barrier 34 . The hydrological connectivity of aquatic habitats, on the other hand, should be modelled separately as it has a linear network structure.More generally, focal-species and species-agnostic approaches both are known to be sensitive to resistance values, which are often based on expert opinion, and a rigorous assessment of the sensitivity to parameter settings is required [35][36][37] . For instance, Koen et al 28 successfully validated a species-agnostic model of landscape connectivity with road mortality data of reptiles and amphibians and with molecular genetic data for a mammalian species.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More generally, focal-species and species-agnostic approaches both are known to be sensitive to resistance values, which are often based on expert opinion, and a rigorous assessment of the sensitivity to parameter settings is required [35][36][37] . For instance, Koen et al 28 successfully validated a species-agnostic model of landscape connectivity with road mortality data of reptiles and amphibians and with molecular genetic data for a mammalian species.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This aligns with the movement suitability we found in these areas—the Stateline Pass corridor is a nearly continuous strip (700 m wide and 2 km long) of high movement quality habitat between the adjacent valleys, while the McCullough Pass corridor has no areas of contiguous high movement quality habitat, requiring tortoises to move through considerable low quality movement habitat to disperse across the landscape. This distinction reinforces the importance of using movement data and finer scale raster resolution rather than modeled habitat suitability values to create resistance surfaces [ 13 , 86 , 87 ]. Use of the habitat suitability models previously developed for the Mojave desert tortoise at coarser resolution (1-km 2 [ 25 ], 250-m 2 [ 58 ]) suggests that resistance across Stateline and McCullough passes is roughly equivalent, while our movement-based model at a finer resolution (30-m) better represents the level at which tortoises are making movement decisions.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…However, another recent paper pointed out that connectivity estimates are rather robust to uncertainty in selected cost values, unlike other sources of error, i.e. number of land use represented, spatial resolution or misclassification of edges between landscape classes (Simpkins et al, 2017). Thus, it would be interesting to develop a collaborative database that identifies the elements of the landscape that facilitate species movement (ponds, low walls, wildlife crossings), or breaks in continuity (fences, obstacles) that cannot be detected by photo-interpretation.…”
Section: Limitations and Alternatives To The Methodological Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 99%