2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2019.02.031
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Environmental impact assessment of development projects improved by merging species distribution and habitat connectivity modelling

Abstract: Francis Isselin-Nondedeu. Environmental impact assessment of development projects improved by merging species distribution and habitat connectivity modelling. Journal of Environmental Management, Elsevier, 2019, 241, pp. AbstractEnvironmental impact assessment (EIA) is performed to limit potential impacts of development projects on species and ecosystem functions. However, the methods related to EIA actually pay little attention to the landscape-scale effects of development projects on biodiversity. In this st… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

3
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 85 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This method has recently been applied in land-use planning for habitat prioritization and connectivity improvement (Clauzel et al, 2018;Foltête, 2018). In addition, a recentlydeveloped methodological framework combining SDM and spatial graphs has improved assessment of the environmental impacts of development projects, valuable input to decision-making (Duflot et al, 2018;Tarabon et al, 2019). However, although the latter study strongly recommended that the framework be applied to implement appropriate avoidance and reduction measures, this has not yet followed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method has recently been applied in land-use planning for habitat prioritization and connectivity improvement (Clauzel et al, 2018;Foltête, 2018). In addition, a recentlydeveloped methodological framework combining SDM and spatial graphs has improved assessment of the environmental impacts of development projects, valuable input to decision-making (Duflot et al, 2018;Tarabon et al, 2019). However, although the latter study strongly recommended that the framework be applied to implement appropriate avoidance and reduction measures, this has not yet followed.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Akaike information criterion (AIC) quantity reflects the fitting and complexity of the model, which is an excellent standard to measure the performance of the model. A model with a minimum AICc value (i.e., delta AICc = 0) is considered the best model [14]. The area under the ROC curve (AUC), true skill statistic (TSS) and Cohen's Kappa (Kappa) were used to evaluate model accuracy [15].…”
Section: Model Optimization and Validationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The value of area (0-1) under the ROC curve (AUC) can well reflect the accuracy of model prediction. Thus, the model was optimized according to the AIC values (delta AIC) and the difference between the training AUC value and the test AUC value (AUC DIFF ) [14,36].…”
Section: Establishment Optimization and Evaluation Of Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…They have recently grown in popularity as a way to easily identify ecological networks (see for instance Clauzel & Bonnevalle, 2019;Mechai et al, 2018;Niculae, Nita, Vanau, & Patroescu, 2016), to assess the effects of fragmentation and loss of landscape connectivity (Clauzel, 2017;Liu, Peng, Zhang, & Zhao, 2016;Tournant, Afonso, Roué, Giraudoux, & Foltête, 2013), and to wholly or partially implement the mitigation hierarchy (for instance Bergès et al, 2020;Clauzel, Bannwarth, & Foltête, 2015;Tarabon, Bergès, Dutoit, & Isselin-Nondedeu, 2019a, b). Moreover, graph-theory-based models can be combined with species distribution models (SDMs) to identify habitat patches (see Tarabon et al, 2019a). SDMs relate species distribution records to environmental data and can be used to produce maps of habitat suitability (Elith et al, 2006).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%