1989
DOI: 10.1016/0301-5629(89)90162-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of ultrasound exposure in vitro on neuroblastoma cell membranes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0
2

Year Published

1990
1990
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
7
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…hydrophilic, molecule that normally crosses the lipid bilayer of the plasma membrane at a slow rate, mainly by passive diffusion (Hecquet et al, 1986). HESW exposure could transiently permeabilise the cell membrane, thus reducing the diffusion barrier for CDDP and increasing CDDP influx in analogy with results obtained by ultrasQund exposure (Ellwart et al, 1987;Kober et al, 1989;Fahnestock et al, 1989) or electropermeabilisation of cells (Melvik et al, 1986). This interpretation seems reasonable regarding the enhanced proliferation capacity following a second HESW administration after concomitant CDDP/HESW treatment.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…hydrophilic, molecule that normally crosses the lipid bilayer of the plasma membrane at a slow rate, mainly by passive diffusion (Hecquet et al, 1986). HESW exposure could transiently permeabilise the cell membrane, thus reducing the diffusion barrier for CDDP and increasing CDDP influx in analogy with results obtained by ultrasQund exposure (Ellwart et al, 1987;Kober et al, 1989;Fahnestock et al, 1989) or electropermeabilisation of cells (Melvik et al, 1986). This interpretation seems reasonable regarding the enhanced proliferation capacity following a second HESW administration after concomitant CDDP/HESW treatment.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 71%
“…Knowledge of the effectiveness of US was traditionally based on studies on tissue repair in animals, 10,11 and to a large extent, on in vitro studies. [12][13][14][15] Moreover, a look at the information currently available online on the supposed benefi ts of US therapy for musculoskeletal disorders cites stimulation of blood fl ow to promote healing, relieve pain and infl ammation, reduce muscle spasms, and increase the range of motion. 16 However, a good number of studies on the clinical effectiveness of US in physical therapy revealed contrasting results.…”
Section: Physical Therapymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ultrasound may damage cells irreversibly and induce severe cell membrane modifications (2)(3)(4). The effect of ultrasound on cells has been correlated with the generation of acoustic cavitations (2,5,6).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%