2014
DOI: 10.1177/0194599814527574
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Type 2 Diabetes on Otoacoustic Emissions and the Medial Olivocochlear Reflex

Abstract: Although decreased OAE amplitude levels were found in diabetic patients, there was no statistically significant difference in OAEs and MOC reflex. Additional studies are needed to evaluate the role of OAEs and MOC reflex in normal-hearing patients with diabetes.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
4
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
(53 reference statements)
1
4
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, there was no linear correlation of the mean TEOAE amplitudes to the metabolic control or the duration of diabetes; similar to other studies. 37 We report that in the diabetic group, the latency time of wave V was significantly longer compared to the control group (5.92±0.38 ms versus 5.68±0.18 ms, p <0.001) similar to other studies. 38,39 Our study reports variations to these studies as regards to the latencies of I and III waves, which may have probably resulted due to the pathogenetic mechanism involved in the various patients of the study populations in these studies.…”
Section: Auditory Brainstem Responses (Abr)supporting
confidence: 90%
“…However, there was no linear correlation of the mean TEOAE amplitudes to the metabolic control or the duration of diabetes; similar to other studies. 37 We report that in the diabetic group, the latency time of wave V was significantly longer compared to the control group (5.92±0.38 ms versus 5.68±0.18 ms, p <0.001) similar to other studies. 38,39 Our study reports variations to these studies as regards to the latencies of I and III waves, which may have probably resulted due to the pathogenetic mechanism involved in the various patients of the study populations in these studies.…”
Section: Auditory Brainstem Responses (Abr)supporting
confidence: 90%
“…11 The results of study conducted by Eren et al were contradictory to present study, in which no statistically significant difference is there between DPOAE amplitude (Ldp) between 40 diabetics and 24 control group in frequencies 1, 2, 2.5, 3,4, 5, 6, 7, and 8 kHz, however small study group can be a limitation of their study. 15 Bayindir et al investigated role of glycaemic control on outer hair cell functions. 16 They found that there is no statistical difference in DPOAE function in controlled and non-controlled diabetes.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Agarwal et al 25 found absence of TEOAE on 30% of the samples, and Lerman-Garber et al 13 in just 15%, but in both studies, patients evaluated were younger diabetics (ages up to 50 years old) and the audiometric findings revealed the prevalence of mild loss, which can justify the greater number of TEOAE present, since the presence of TEOAE on most individuals correlates with the degree of loss, and may be obtained in hearing loss less than 40dB 25 . Eren et al 16 analyzed the TEOAE and DPOAE in DM patients, average age of 47 years and normal hearing, and, although it was found decreased amplitude, the difference between the DM and the control group was not statistically significant.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies indicate sensorioneural hearing loss at high frequencies 12,13 , while others have found low and medium frequencies deficit 14 . Studies involving the analysis of the OAE are also diverging to findings, while some showed reduction of amplitude of responses in diabetic patients 2,15 ; others found no significant difference between the groups with DM and the control 16 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 94%