2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0022-3913(03)00434-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of two preparation designs and pontic distance on bending and fracture strength of fiber-reinforced composite inlay fixed partial dentures

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

3
36
0
2

Year Published

2006
2006
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(41 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
3
36
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, inter-abutment distance varied between 7 to 15 mm in different studies (Keulemans et al, 2009;Mehl et al, 2010;Nakamura et al, 2003;Shah et al, 2009;Song et al, 2003;Waki et al, 2006). In a previous study, it was reported that the fracture strength of inlay-retained FDPs reinforced with FRC was reduced by about 25 to 35% when the inter-abutment distance was increased from 7 to 11 mm (Song et al, 2003).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Furthermore, inter-abutment distance varied between 7 to 15 mm in different studies (Keulemans et al, 2009;Mehl et al, 2010;Nakamura et al, 2003;Shah et al, 2009;Song et al, 2003;Waki et al, 2006). In a previous study, it was reported that the fracture strength of inlay-retained FDPs reinforced with FRC was reduced by about 25 to 35% when the inter-abutment distance was increased from 7 to 11 mm (Song et al, 2003).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In a previous study, it was reported that the fracture strength of inlay-retained FDPs reinforced with FRC was reduced by about 25 to 35% when the inter-abutment distance was increased from 7 to 11 mm (Song et al, 2003). All-ceramic inlay-retained FDPs are reported to have higher fracture strength values than their FRC reinforced counterparts.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The size of these preparation features depends on the size of the tooth. The tested design is the most used in CIRPFDs [10][11][12]50,53,58]. The dimension of the full coverage all ceramic FPDs were constructed according to Rosenstiel et al (2006) [65].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The occlusal preparation was 4 mm wide and extended 4 or 6 mm mesio-distally for the premolar or molar models, respectively. The proximal box was 1 mm wide and had approximately 5˚ divergence, extending 2 mm apical to the isthmus floor [53]. The preparations corresponded to a proximal connector area of 3 mm × 3 mm for molars and premolars.…”
Section: Inlay Design Preparationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the context of short-term evaluation periods, clinical studies of FRCs have shown a relatively high success rate [12][13][14] . In particular, the mechanical properties of FRC restorative materials have been shown to be enhanced by either using Received Dec 8, 2008: Accepted Feb 13, 2009 preimpregnated fibers beneath the composite resin restorative material or reinforcing the composite material with fiber impregnation 15,16) .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%