2019
DOI: 10.1007/s10854-019-00882-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of twin boundaries on the void formation in Cu-filled through silicon vias under thermal process

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Critical dimensions (CD) Signal integrity, device reliability OCD [6], WLI [7], CD-SEM [8], CD-SAXS [9], AFM [10], FIB-SEM (destructive) [11], TEM (destructive) [12] Bonding overlay Stacking accuracy, bonding reliability, signal integrity IR microscopy [13], IBO [14], DBO [15] TSV Voids Electrical and reliability failures, signal integrity FIB-SEM (destructive) [16], SAM [17], X-ray microscopy [18] Bonded interface defects Bonding reliability, signal integrity IR microscopy [19], SAM [20], FIB-SEM (destructive) [21] Bond strength uniformity Bonding reliability, cracking Micro-chevron testing [22] Stress/Strain measurement Bonding reliability, cracking, warpage, mechanical failure Raman [23], XRD [24], EBSD [25] * OCD: Optical critical dimension, WLI: White light interferometer, SEM: Scanning electron microscopy, SAXS: Small angle X-ray scattering, AFM: Atomic force microscopy, FIB: Focused ion beam, IR: infrared, IBO: Image-based overlay, DBO: Diffraction-based overlay, SAM: Scanning acoustic microscopy, XRD: X-ray diffraction, EBSD: Electron backscatter diffraction.…”
Section: Metrology Targets Impacts On Device Performance Current Solu...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Critical dimensions (CD) Signal integrity, device reliability OCD [6], WLI [7], CD-SEM [8], CD-SAXS [9], AFM [10], FIB-SEM (destructive) [11], TEM (destructive) [12] Bonding overlay Stacking accuracy, bonding reliability, signal integrity IR microscopy [13], IBO [14], DBO [15] TSV Voids Electrical and reliability failures, signal integrity FIB-SEM (destructive) [16], SAM [17], X-ray microscopy [18] Bonded interface defects Bonding reliability, signal integrity IR microscopy [19], SAM [20], FIB-SEM (destructive) [21] Bond strength uniformity Bonding reliability, cracking Micro-chevron testing [22] Stress/Strain measurement Bonding reliability, cracking, warpage, mechanical failure Raman [23], XRD [24], EBSD [25] * OCD: Optical critical dimension, WLI: White light interferometer, SEM: Scanning electron microscopy, SAXS: Small angle X-ray scattering, AFM: Atomic force microscopy, FIB: Focused ion beam, IR: infrared, IBO: Image-based overlay, DBO: Diffraction-based overlay, SAM: Scanning acoustic microscopy, XRD: X-ray diffraction, EBSD: Electron backscatter diffraction.…”
Section: Metrology Targets Impacts On Device Performance Current Solu...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition, protrusion profiles were found to show different surface characteristics. The influence of annealing conditions on the protrusion profiles was recently examined by Zhao [14,15], in which the protrusion profiles were classified into global and local protrusion according to the variation of grain structures after annealing at different temperatures. Due to the impact of stresses from the adjoining TSVs, the deformation behavior of TSVs is also influenced by the pitch distance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, SEM imaging analysis of the cross section of the TSV is destructive, time consuming and depends on the sample-cutting technique (Fursenko et al, 2015). Another nanoscale imaging tool is the atomic force microscope (AFM), which can offer quantitative measurement of surface undulation (Bender et al, 2012;Zhao et al, 2019). Nevertheless, a narrow field of view makes it difficult to conclude an overall evaluation on the etching process.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Obviously, this is not the real case for practical TSV etching. The transmission electron microscope (TEM) is often reported as a tool for thickness measurement of dielectric layers and diffusion barrier layers because of its extremely high spatial resolution (Bender et al, 2012;Zhao et al, 2019). Although the methods listed above have their advantages, they share the same limitation that the overall 3D information cannot be acquired.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%