Effects of training with elastic resistance versus conventional resistance on muscular strength: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Lopes, Jaqueline Santos Silva; Machado, Aryane Flauzino; Micheletti, Jéssica Kirsch; Almeida, Aline Castilho de; Cavina, Allysiê Priscilla de Souza; Pastre, Carlos Marcelo

doi:10.1177/2050312119831116

Cited by 87 publications

(102 citation statements)

References 23 publications

(84 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…Not defining a population with homogeneous characteristics allowed for holistic perception regarding the analyzed methods and similar conclusions to other studies [16,19,23]. Regarding this aspect, a recently published review and metaanalysis [27], when comparing different population profiles, found similar results between conventional and elastic devices for muscle strength gain.…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 54%

Training with elastic and conventional devices on body composition: systematic review and meta-analysis

Lopes

Neto²,

Gomes

et al. 2020

Fisioter. mov.

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Licensed under a Creative Commons attributionTraining with elastic and conventional devices on body composition: systematic review and meta-analysis Treinamento em dispositivos elásticos e convencionais sobre a composição corporal: revisão sistemática e meta-análise Entrenamiento en dispositivos elásticos y convencionales sobre composición corporal: revisión sistemática y metaanálisis Abstract Introduction: Given the practicality and low cost of elastic devices, a comparison with conventional devices may be able to quantify gains from both tools for further conclusions. Objective: Compare the effect of resistance training with elastic (tubes and resistance band) and conventional (weight machines and dumbbells) devices on body composition. Method: This is a systematic review and meta-analysis. The PubMed/MEDLINE, Embase, PEDro and CENTRAL databases were searched from the earliest records to July 25, 2018. Data were described in standardized mean difference (SMD) with a 95% confidence interval (95% CI). Results: Four studies were

show abstract

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 54%

Training with elastic and conventional devices on body composition: systematic review and meta-analysis

Lopes

Neto²,

Gomes

et al. 2020

Fisioter. mov.

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The major route of administration was oral (77.0%) [6,7,8,10,17,20,21,22,23,25,27,29,28,[30][31][32][33][34]36,37,38,39]. Some studies analyzed topical (11.5%) [9,24,26] , or both (11.5%) [23,35,37].…”

Section: Resultsmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) was used as a guideline [16,17]. This review was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO).…”

Section: Methodsmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

Use of Anti-Inflammatory Drugs interventions for the treatment of Muscle Soreness: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Nahon¹,

Neto²,

Lopes³

et al. 2020

Preprint

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: To investigate the effects of pharmacological interventions in the treatment of Delayed Onset Muscle Soreness (DOMS). Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled clinical trials (RCTs). Data sources: The PubMed / MEDLINE, EMBASE, SPORTDiscus, Scielo and CENTRAL (Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials) databases were searched from the oldest records to August 3, 2020. Eligibility criteria: 1) Tue used a RCTs design; 2) Evaluate the effects of Steroidal or Non-Steroidal Anti-Inflammatory Drugs (NSAIDs) for treatment DOMS; and 3) Therapeutically used drugs, after exercise. Results: In total, 26 studies (patients = 934) were eligible for qualitative analysis on the treatment of DOMS. The results of the meta-analysis showed no superiority between the use or not of NSAIDs, in the improvement of late muscle pain, since statistically significant differences were not verified (21 studies, n= 955; SMD= 0.02; 95% CI -0.58, 0.63; p=0.94; I2=93%). The quality of the synthesized evidence was very low according to the criteria of Evaluation, Development and Evaluation of the Classification of Recommendations, associated with the significant heterogeneity among the included studies. Conclusion: The results demonstrate that the use of NSAIDs is not a superior treatment to the control / placebo on DOMS improvement. The variation between dose-response and exercise protocol used in the studies may have influenced the results. In addition, the high risk of identified bias characterizes limitation to be considered in profound interpretations.

show abstract

“…The total score ranges from zero to 10 points, in which higher scores represent better methodological quality. A PEDro score equal to or greater than 7 was considered "high quality", studies whose scores were 5 or 6 were considered "moderate quality" and those whose score was 4 or less were considered "poor quality" [25,26].…”

Section: Methodological Quality Assessmentmentioning

confidence: 99%

Specific interventions for prevention of muscle injury in lower limbs: systematic review and meta-analysis

et al. 2019

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Intervenções específicas para prevenção de lesão muscular em membros inferiores: revisão sistemática e meta-análiseIntervenciones específicas para la prevención de lesiones musculares en miembros inferiores: revisión sistemática y meta-análisis Abstract Introduction: Muscle injuries show an incidence associated with extreme stretching, or even a highintensity eccentric contraction. Such injuries cause severe damage to athletes, including lower performance, withdrawal, and psychological distress. In this scenario, the study of effective preventive methods is an indispensable factor in the routine of professional athletes, to reduce the incidence of injuries. Objective: To verify the effectiveness of three different interventions (warm-up, neuromuscular training, and eccentric Lopes JSS, Machado AF, Cavina AP, Micheletti JK, Almeida AC, Pastre CM. 2 exercise) to prevent muscle injuries in the lower limbs. Method: We searched the Cochrane Library, EMBASE, SPORTDiscus, PEDro, and PubMed databases from the earliest records until January 20, 2018. The search was performed from word combinations such as clinical trial, muscle strain, injury prevention. The data related to the outcome of prevention were grouped in meta-analysis and described in Risk Ratio (RR) with 95% confidence interval. Results: Sixteen studies were included: five assessed eccentric exercise, three investigated neuromuscular training, and eight observed warm-up. The eccentric exercise (RR = 3.49, 95% CI 2.36, 5.16, p < 0.00001) and the neuromuscular training (RR = 2.73, 95% CI 2.03, 2.68, p < 0.00001) showed significant effects on the prevention of muscle injuries in lower limbs. On the other hand, warm-up (RR = 1.57, 95% CI 0.92, 2.7, p = 0.10) was irrelevant in reducing the incidence of injuries in the body segment investigated. Conclusion: The outcomes presented provide clinical relevance inherent in the field practices, with intrinsic potential for practical application in the management of specific preventive techniques.Introdução: Lesões musculares apresentam incidência associada à alongamento extremo, ou ainda, a uma contração excêntrica de alta intensidade. Tais lesões, acarretam prejuízos graves aos atletas que incluem queda de rendimento, afastamento e transtornos psicológicos. Neste cenário, o estudo de métodos preventivos eficazes, constituem fator indispensável na rotina de atletas profissionais, a fim de, reduzir a incidência de lesões. Objetivo: Verificar a eficácia de três diferentes intervenções (aquecimento, treinamento neuromuscular e exercício excêntrico) para prevenção de lesões musculares em membros inferiores. Método: Foram pesquisadas as bases de dados Cochrane Library, EMBASE, Sports Discus, PEDro e PubMed desde os registros mais antigos até 20 de janeiro de 2018. A busca foi realizada a partir de combinações de palavras, como, clinical trial, muscle strain, injury prevention. Os dados relacionados ao desfecho prevenção foram agrupados em meta-análise e descritos em Risk Ratio (RR) com intervalo de confiança de 95%. Resultad...

show abstract

Effects of training with elastic resistance versus conventional resistance on muscular strength: A systematic review and meta-analysis

Cited by 87 publications

References 23 publications

Training with elastic and conventional devices on body composition: systematic review and meta-analysis

Training with elastic and conventional devices on body composition: systematic review and meta-analysis

Use of Anti-Inflammatory Drugs interventions for the treatment of Muscle Soreness: a Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

Specific interventions for prevention of muscle injury in lower limbs: systematic review and meta-analysis

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About