2011
DOI: 10.1002/eqe.1032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of torsion on the behavior of peripheral steel‐braced frame systems

Abstract: In this study, the torsional response of buildings with peripheral steel-braced frame lateral systems is evaluated. A three-dimensional model of a three story braced frame with various levels of eccentricity is created and the effects of torsion on the seismic response is assessed for four hazard levels. The response history analysis results indicate that, unlike frame structures, the torsional amplifications in the inelastic systems exceed those of corresponding elastic systems and tend to increase with an in… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

1
13
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
1
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In general, higher mode effects decrease both in elevation and in plan, with increasing ground motion intensity. Some exceptions, representing extremely torsionally stiff structures, are discussed in De Stefano and Pintucchi (2010); Erduran and Ryan (2010). So, it is difficult to develop a relatively simple approach which would be able to simulate the structural response over the whole range of ground motion intensities that a structure may experience.…”
Section: Background Of the Extended Nmethods And Its Basic Assumptionsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…In general, higher mode effects decrease both in elevation and in plan, with increasing ground motion intensity. Some exceptions, representing extremely torsionally stiff structures, are discussed in De Stefano and Pintucchi (2010); Erduran and Ryan (2010). So, it is difficult to develop a relatively simple approach which would be able to simulate the structural response over the whole range of ground motion intensities that a structure may experience.…”
Section: Background Of the Extended Nmethods And Its Basic Assumptionsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…This kind of buildings constitutes the common case in real life so it is urgent to implement updating formulations in these procedures turning the structural response as realistic as possible. Some efforts have been made to take this generation of NSPs to a higher performance level (Chopra and Goel 2004;Fajfar et al 2005;Bento et al 2010;Stefano and Pintucchi 2010;Erduran and Ryan 2010). The Eurocode8-1 (4.3.3.4.2.7 Procedure for the estimation of the torsional effects) includes some guidelines for the determination of torsional effects based on elastic analysis (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various studies have examined in detail the seismic drift demands in plan‐asymmetric structures, for example 9–11 , including the effects of degradation 12 and ground‐motion scaling 13 . However, a basic lack of agreement subsists in relation to the definition of adequate parameters of the system and its response 14 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The seismic response of eccentric buildings is particularly sensitive to the features of the ground motion 19 and issues concerning the selection, scaling and application of ground‐motion records deserve careful consideration 20 . Although real seismic motion involves three translational and three rotational components, and robust procedures for the estimation of rotational motions have now become available, 21 it is still customary to neglect the effects of the rotational ground‐motion components 8 and rely on the application of orthogonal pairs of acceleration series 11,22,23 . In this regard, several researchers have studied the influence of the record‐pair orientation on the estimation of structural responses from non‐linear response history analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%