2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.energy.2017.01.056
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of the preheat layer thickness on surface/submerged flame during porous media combustion of micro burner

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
20
0
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 61 publications
(27 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
1
20
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In summary, the experimental results indicate that vertical surface roughness cannot be significantly improved by optimising laser power, scanning speed or hatching spacing to meet the recommended biomedical implant roughness Ra= 1-2 μm [37]. Other parameters such as particle size distribution, layer thickness, and the position of the parts in the building platform have also shown to affect the vertical surface roughness [44][45][46]. Results from the horizontal surface roughness and the dimensional deviation of the MCs clearly indicate that an implant sample cannot simultaneously achieve an optimum dimensional deviation and horizontal surface roughness as shown in Figure 5 and Figure 7.…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…In summary, the experimental results indicate that vertical surface roughness cannot be significantly improved by optimising laser power, scanning speed or hatching spacing to meet the recommended biomedical implant roughness Ra= 1-2 μm [37]. Other parameters such as particle size distribution, layer thickness, and the position of the parts in the building platform have also shown to affect the vertical surface roughness [44][45][46]. Results from the horizontal surface roughness and the dimensional deviation of the MCs clearly indicate that an implant sample cannot simultaneously achieve an optimum dimensional deviation and horizontal surface roughness as shown in Figure 5 and Figure 7.…”
Section: Accepted Manuscriptmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…The flame temperature also decreased for 30 PPI (pores per inch) SiC foam relative to the 25 PPI SiC foam. The effects of preheat layer thickness on flame in a microporous burner is experimentally investigated by Janvekar et al 28 The results showed that when the 5‐mm preheat layer is used, only surface flame can be seen, while 10‐ and 15‐mm preheat layer can affect both surface and submerged flame zone. Also, they reported that the highest thermal efficiency is related to 10‐mm preheat layer among those of the three thickness.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was found that when the gas mixture energy content and heat recovery capacity of the system were increased, higher values of electrical potential, thermoelectric efficiency, and flame temperatures were reached. In recent years, the attention was paid to two‐section porous burners for their favorable flame stabilization . Gao et al systematically put the combustion in a double‐layer burner under different conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, the attention was paid to twosection porous burners for their favorable flame stabilization. [18][19][20] Gao et al [21][22][23] systematically put the combustion in a double-layer burner under different conditions. It showed that the component and diluent's mass fraction greatly affected the stability limit, flame temperature and speed, and pollutant emissions.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%