2008
DOI: 10.3168/jds.2007-0358
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of the Chop Lengths of Alfalfa Silage and Oat Silage on Feed Intake, Milk Production, Feeding Behavior, and Rumen Fermentation of Dairy Cows

Abstract: Effects of chop length (shorter: 6 mm, or longer: 19 mm) of alfalfa silage and oat silage were determined in 16 mid-lactation Holstein cows, 4 of which were rumen cannulated, using a replicated 4 x 4 Latin square design with a 2 x 2 arrangement of treatments. Experimental periods were 21 d long and consisted of 14 d of adaptation and 7 d of sampling. Cows received a total mixed ration containing [dry matter (DM) basis] 42.0% barley grain-based energy supplement, 10% protein supplement, and 24% of DM longer cho… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

5
37
4
7

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
5
37
4
7
Order By: Relevance
“…Baumont et al (1990) showed in an experiment with ewes that the eating rate was highest in the beginning of a forage meal. Chopping did not affect rate of eating or mean eating time in agreement with observation in dairy cow fed alfalfa silage (Bhandari et al, 2008) or whole crop barley silage (Beauchemin and Yang, 2005), whereas Deswysen et al (1984) observed a higher rate of eating in heifers fed grass silage due to chopping. The lower proportion of particles retained on the 1 mm sieve size and the lower mode, mean and 95 percentile PL and PW values in swallowed silage boli in cows fed chopped silage (Tables 5 and 6) in combination with no effect of chopping on rate of eating and mean eating time per kg NDF indicate that the masticative activity during intake is not only controlled by the particle size.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…Baumont et al (1990) showed in an experiment with ewes that the eating rate was highest in the beginning of a forage meal. Chopping did not affect rate of eating or mean eating time in agreement with observation in dairy cow fed alfalfa silage (Bhandari et al, 2008) or whole crop barley silage (Beauchemin and Yang, 2005), whereas Deswysen et al (1984) observed a higher rate of eating in heifers fed grass silage due to chopping. The lower proportion of particles retained on the 1 mm sieve size and the lower mode, mean and 95 percentile PL and PW values in swallowed silage boli in cows fed chopped silage (Tables 5 and 6) in combination with no effect of chopping on rate of eating and mean eating time per kg NDF indicate that the masticative activity during intake is not only controlled by the particle size.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 72%
“…The dietary contents of neural detergent fibre, non-fibre carbohydrate, and starch do not suggest that the cows were at risk of ruminal acidosis and milk fat depression (National Research Council 2001). However, the average geometrical particle length of the experimental diet in this study was well below the ranges of this particle length of total mixed rations reported by Bhandari et al (2007) (6.7 to 8.5 mm) and by Bhandari et al (2008) (8.6 to 10.9 mm). Krause and Combs (2003) fed a diet with a similar average geometrical dietary particle length (4.2 mm) and a similar grain content compared with the diet used in our study, and observed that feeding this diet to lactating dairy cows, resulted in an average rumen pH of 5.73, a duration of rumen pH below 5.8 of 6.2 h d (1 , and a milk fat content of 2.71%.…”
contrasting
confidence: 72%
“…Estudos prévios com vacas leiteiras também reportaram que o maior consumo de MS ocorreu nas primeiras quatro horas após o fornecimento da ração fresca no comedouro (Bhandari et al, 2008, Carvalho et al, 2012 Não houve resposta (P>0,05) da fonte de forragem sobre o PC em todo o período experimental (Tabela 5), reforçando a hipótese de que a fonte de forragem não exerce influência sobre o desempenho animal, desde que os níveis nutricionais das dietas sejam semelhantes. Em outros estudos, o ganho de peso diário e o PC pré-abate também não foram alterados pela fonte de forragem (Fernandes et al, 2007), mesmo quando os níveis de FDN e CNF na dieta à base de SM foram respectivamente menores e maiores em relação à dieta com SC (Roman et al, 2011), o que teoricamente poderia resultar no maior ganho de peso nos animais alimentados com SM.…”
Section: Resultsunclassified