2020
DOI: 10.2224/sbp.8322
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of taboo conversation topics on impression formation and task performance evaluation

Abstract: We examined how taboo conversation topics, such as being arrested, religion, and one's body weight, affect impression formation and task performance. In an experiment with 109 women, each participant and a female research confederate, whom the participant believed to be another participant, had a conversation and were asked to complete a task. We manipulated the conversation topics and actual task performance of the confederate, and measured participants' communication satisfaction; perception of the confeder… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 0 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Participants rarely mentioned luxury products or products that revealed intimate parts of their identities, such as religious beliefs. These products are classic identity signals (Han et al, 2010), but given cultural taboos on discussing religion or money (Lee et al, 2020), appear to rarely facilitate conversation. However, some interviewees described a benefit to displaying products with limited appeal: helping them screen prospective friends for compatibility.…”
Section: Gen Er a L Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Participants rarely mentioned luxury products or products that revealed intimate parts of their identities, such as religious beliefs. These products are classic identity signals (Han et al, 2010), but given cultural taboos on discussing religion or money (Lee et al, 2020), appear to rarely facilitate conversation. However, some interviewees described a benefit to displaying products with limited appeal: helping them screen prospective friends for compatibility.…”
Section: Gen Er a L Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%