2006
DOI: 10.1111/j.1439-037x.2006.00238.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of 15N Split‐application on Soil and Fertiliser N Uptake of Barley, Oilseed Rape and Wheat in Different Cropping Systems

Abstract: In intensive farming systems, farmers split up and apply the N fertilization to winter cereals and oilseed rape (OSR) at several dates to meet the need of the crop more precisely. Our objective was to determine how prior fertilizer N application as slurry and/or mineral N affects contributions of fertilizer-and soil-derived N to N uptake of barley (1997), oilseed rape (OSR; 1998) and wheat (1999). In addition, residual fertilizer N effects were observed in the subsequent crop. Since autumn 1991, slurry (none, … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 25 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The total N uptake by wheat derived from urea fertilizer was higher in SA (20.7–76.1 kg ha −1 ) than in BA treatment (19.0–43.4 kg ha −1 ), showing that SA of N fertilizer could enhance N uptake from N fertilizer, especially for higher N application rates. Large amounts of N fertilizer applied at sowing time likely increased fertilizer-N immobilized by soil microorganisms, and then led to poor synchrony between N supply and crop demand 34 36 . López-Bellido et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The total N uptake by wheat derived from urea fertilizer was higher in SA (20.7–76.1 kg ha −1 ) than in BA treatment (19.0–43.4 kg ha −1 ), showing that SA of N fertilizer could enhance N uptake from N fertilizer, especially for higher N application rates. Large amounts of N fertilizer applied at sowing time likely increased fertilizer-N immobilized by soil microorganisms, and then led to poor synchrony between N supply and crop demand 34 36 . López-Bellido et al .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The surface-applied N fertilizer absorbed by plants is dependent on subsequent rainfall and it cannot move into the root zone and be utilized by plants when rainfall is limited 19 . The other reason was that large amounts of N fertilizer were likely taken up by soil microbes in the early growing stage of wheat due to low wheat competition, and so high levels of N fertilizer were in organic forms in the soil during the rapid growth stage of wheat 36 38 . High application rate of N fertilizer at the early growth stage of the crop would enhance the unaccounted N losses through N leaching 34 .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The uptake of N derived from the first N rate applied at the beginning of spring growth was poorer than that from the second splitting rate applied at stem elongation or third splitting rate applied at ear emergence (Sieling, Beims, 2007). In contrast, N applied later in the growing season was taken up more quickly, resulting in higher fertilizer NUE.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 87%
“…In intensive farming systems, farmers split up and apply the N fertilization to winter cereals (barley and wheat) and oilseed rape at several dates to meet the need of the crop more precisely (Sieling and Beims 2007). All three crops utilized the splitting rates differently depending on the time of application.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%