Spring triticale yield formation and nitrogen use efficiency as affected by nitrogen rate and its splitting

Janušauskaitė, Daiva

doi:10.13080/z-a.2013.100.049

Cited by 14 publications

(17 citation statements)

References 19 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…On the other hand, protein yield in triticale grain not fertilized with mineral N did not significantly depend on weather conditions in the research years, and was up to 82.6% determined by the applied forecrops. Janusauskaite (2013) found similar correlations Vol. 62, 2016, No.…”

Section: Resultssupporting

confidence: 59%

See 1 more Smart Citation

The after-effect of chosen Fabaceae forecrops on the yield of grain and protein in winter triticale (Triticosecale sp. Wittmack ex A. Camus 1927) fertilized with mineral nitrogen

Prusiński¹,

Borowska²,

Kaszkowiak³

et al. 2016

PLANT SOIL ENVIRON

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Two-way field experiment was carried out in a split-plot design in 4 growing seasons at the Experimental Station of the Bydgoszcz University of Science and Technology in Mochełek (Poland). The forecrops for winter triticale cv. Tulus were lupins: yellow, blue and white, field pea and spring barley. Nitrogen (N) fertilization in triticale after harvesting forecrops was: 0-60-120-180 kg N per ha. Average long-term yields of grain and protein in triticale after leguminous forecrops were statistically similar, by 0.84 t/ha and 86 kg/ha higher than after spring barley. On plots without mineral N fertilization, by over 1.5 t/ha more grain was obtained after leguminous forecrops, and by 142 kg/ha more protein than on the plot after spring barley. However, the rate of 180 kg N/ha guaranteed obtaining a significantly highest mean protein yield in triticale. The applied mineral N fertilization at rates from 60 to 180 kg N/ha did not significantly vary the average yield of winter triticale. Mineral nitrogen (N min ) content in the layer 0-60 cm after harvesting the leguminous forecrop without mineral N fertilization was by 25.5% higher than after harvesting spring barley fertilized with a rate of 60 kg N per ha.

show abstract

Section: Resultssupporting

confidence: 59%

“…62, 2016, No. 12: 571-576 doi: 10.17221/463/2016-PSE plot 0 N, similarly (by 35.7%) as in the studies of Janusauskaite (2013). The total protein content in the grain of triticale cv.…”

supporting

confidence: 69%

The after-effect of chosen Fabaceae forecrops on the yield of grain and protein in winter triticale (Triticosecale sp. Wittmack ex A. Camus 1927) fertilized with mineral nitrogen

Prusiński¹,

Borowska²,

Kaszkowiak³

et al. 2016

PLANT SOIL ENVIRON

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…The highest dose of boron applied in the experiment caused a decrease in the quantity of grain yield and its component parts.Agronomy 2020, 10, 279 2 of 12 claim that winter cereals will be grown in northern regions on a much larger area in the near future than at present.One of the most important agrotechnical factors influencing the yield of grain and enabling farmers to take full advantage of the high production potential of cereals is mineral fertilization, especially nitrogen nutrition [9,[15][16][17]. In intensive plant production, the level of nitrogen fertilization and the date of its application are essential for the attainment of high productivity of plants, supplying good quality yields [18].Boron is one of the micronutrients that are deficient in soil [19]. According to Herrera-Rodriguez [20], large areas of farmland across the world are characterized by a boron deficit, which inhibits the growth, development, and yielding of major crops.…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Impact of Nitrogen and Boron Fertilization on Winter Triticale Productivity Parameters

2020

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Research related to fertilization in winter triticale cultivation was limited to macroelements. The effects of boron on triticale (deficiency or toxicity) affecting productivity are still unknown. In 2013-2015, a field experiment was carried out at the Experimental Station in Tomaszkowo near Olsztyn. The objective was set response of winter triticale variety Pigmej under the influence of various levels of nitrogen (N) and boron (B) fertilization. Five levels of nitrogen fertilization: 0, 40, 80 (50 + 30), 120 (90 + 30), and 160 (90 + 70) kg ha −1 and four levels of boron fertilization: 0, 0.8, 1.6, and 2.4 kg ha −1 were tested. The experiment has demonstrated considerable differences in the grain yield volume and structure under the influence of various weather conditions and different doses of nitrogen. The difference between the highest and lowest grain yield was 1.7 t ha −1 -53.6%. The effect of boron application was also manifested as an increase in the winter triticale grain yield and improved yield component structure, but the statistically significant differences were observed only in ears number per 1 m 2 . The highest dose of boron applied in the experiment caused a decrease in the quantity of grain yield and its component parts.Agronomy 2020, 10, 279 2 of 12 claim that winter cereals will be grown in northern regions on a much larger area in the near future than at present.One of the most important agrotechnical factors influencing the yield of grain and enabling farmers to take full advantage of the high production potential of cereals is mineral fertilization, especially nitrogen nutrition [9,[15][16][17]. In intensive plant production, the level of nitrogen fertilization and the date of its application are essential for the attainment of high productivity of plants, supplying good quality yields [18].Boron is one of the micronutrients that are deficient in soil [19]. According to Herrera-Rodriguez [20], large areas of farmland across the world are characterized by a boron deficit, which inhibits the growth, development, and yielding of major crops. In Poland, the majority of soils are light and acidic. This is conducive to boron deficiencies, because the element is readily soluble in water and therefore easily leached from soil.Boron can be applied in long-term and in annual plantations; it is usually supplied in spring or autumn, in the form of solid fertilizers, either to soil or sprayed over foliage, and sometimes even during seed dressing. Plants should have access to this element from germination of maturity [21]. Boron is involved in many processes in the plant, e.g., calcium utilization, cell division, during the generative growth of plants, when the element affects water relations, resistance to diseases, and nitrogen metabolism [22]. Among elements essential for plants, boron is the only element that is absorbed not as an ion but as an uncharged molecule [23].Boron is essential for plants, and recent studies on the biological role of this element in different metabolic, nutritive, hormonal, ...

show abstract

“…If soil is fertilised under current crop parameters, nutrient-uptake efficiency, i.e. proportion of a nutrient added to the soil that is absorbed by a plant growing in the soil (Barber, 1995) is used, or a similar value -nutrient use efficiency (NUE) (Dobermann, 2005;Benincasa et al, 2011;Janušauskaitė, 2013), or recovery of applied fertilisers (fertiliser recovery efficiency) (Greenwood et al, 1989). These concepts are similar but calculation methods and some parameters used for that might differ.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Nitrogen apparent recovery can be used as the indicator of soil nitrogen supply

Kārkliņš

Ruz̆a

2015

Zemdirbyste-Agriculture

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The Nitrates Directive requires considering all possible sources of nitrogen available for crops before decision is made for the use of commercial fertilisers. Soil is one of the nitrogen supplying sources but to quantify the amounts which could be released in a plant available form and take part in yield formation is difficult. Chemical and biological methods developed for laboratory and field conditions do not always give good response or are unpractical for farm conditions. Therefore an indirect soil nitrogen supply assessment method is proposed which could use the data available for each field on every farm. The first step includes estimation of soil total organic nitrogen pool derived from indices of soil organic matter content and soil pH. The second step is the use of soil nitrogen apparent recovery factors, developed from field experiment data. Such factors were developed for winter rye and wheat, spring wheat and barley, winter and spring rape as well as potatoes and are based on 72 field experiments performed in Latvia on mineral soils within a five-year (2008)(2009)(2010)(2011)(2012) period. In average, the following soil nitrogen recovery factors were obtained: for winter cereals -3.3-3.4%, winter rape -2.3%, spring cereals and rape -1.8-2.6% and potatoes -3.8%, calculated from the soil total organic nitrogen pool within 0-20 cm depth. There was strong correlation (r = 0.980, P ≤ 0.01) between apparent recovery values if they were calculated only based on 0-20 cm soil layer or based on 0-40 cm. Therefore it is possible to make calculations only for topsoil data which are commonly available from routine soil tests.

show abstract

Spring triticale yield formation and nitrogen use efficiency as affected by nitrogen rate and its splitting

Cited by 14 publications

References 19 publications

The after-effect of chosen Fabaceae forecrops on the yield of grain and protein in winter triticale (Triticosecale sp. Wittmack ex A. Camus 1927) fertilized with mineral nitrogen

The after-effect of chosen Fabaceae forecrops on the yield of grain and protein in winter triticale (Triticosecale sp. Wittmack ex A. Camus 1927) fertilized with mineral nitrogen

Impact of Nitrogen and Boron Fertilization on Winter Triticale Productivity Parameters

Nitrogen apparent recovery can be used as the indicator of soil nitrogen supply

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About