2003
DOI: 10.1648/0273-8570-74.2.179
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of subcutaneous transmitter implants on behavior, growth, energetics, and survival of Common Loon chicks

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

4
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Survival rates apparently were similar for chicks with implanted and sutured transmitters 28 days after chicks were marked (Larson 1998, Larson et al 2001). In addition, Kenow et al (2003) suggested that the response of chicks to comparable transmitters and attachment techniques might be species-specific. We found no difference in survival probabilities between small and large transmitters, which was consistent with results reported by Burkepile et al (2002) for radiomarked sage-grouse chicks in Idaho.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Survival rates apparently were similar for chicks with implanted and sutured transmitters 28 days after chicks were marked (Larson 1998, Larson et al 2001). In addition, Kenow et al (2003) suggested that the response of chicks to comparable transmitters and attachment techniques might be species-specific. We found no difference in survival probabilities between small and large transmitters, which was consistent with results reported by Burkepile et al (2002) for radiomarked sage-grouse chicks in Idaho.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…In addition, small transmitters were easier to implant and required less time to implant than large transmitters. Kenow et al (2003) also reported greater retention rates for small (0.76 g) compared to large (1.5 g) implanted transmitters in common loon (Gavia immer) chicks. Overall, loss of implanted transmitters during our study was comparable to loss of transmitters implanted in captive ring-necked pheasant chicks (Ewing et al 1994) and transmitters sutured on free-ranging sage-grouse chicks (Burkepile et al 2002).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Histopathological evaluation included bursa, thymus, liver, spleen, adrenal gland, thyroid, gonad, pancreas, muscle, spinal cord, brachial nerve, sciatic nerve, brain, lung, and kidney. Most hatched chicks were marked with a numbered web tag and returned to their natal nests following procedures described in Kenow et al (2003b).…”
Section: Assessment Of Chick Qualitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternately, or in addition, changes in population growth may indicate the increasing influence of density-dependent factors as loon populations recovered from lows in the mid 1990s. This explanation would be consistent with the frequent aggressive encounters 1 E-mail: grear.jason@epa.gov between territory holders and nonbreeding adult floaters; some of which result in injury or death to adults or chicks (Piper et al 2000(Piper et al , 2006Kenow et al 2003). The habitat limitation that this behavior suggests could have strong effects on responses of loon populations to human stressors.…”
mentioning
confidence: 71%