2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.jallcom.2010.01.026
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of structural property and surface modification of Ti6Ta4Sn scaffolds on the response of SaOS2 cells for bone tissue engineering

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2010
2010
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
(78 reference statements)
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This is because there was a geometrical correlation between large pore sizes and less surface area available for the cells to attach to. A similar effect has been observed in other studies in which porous scaffolds of 400m presented enhanced levels of cell attachment for larger levels of porosity [17]. Scaffolds of pore size 212-300m (A3, B3) did not appear to promote cell growth beyond day 7, and in particular B3 yielded the worst performing results from the entire set ( Figure 7, bottom row).…”
Section: Structural and Mechanical Propertiessupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This is because there was a geometrical correlation between large pore sizes and less surface area available for the cells to attach to. A similar effect has been observed in other studies in which porous scaffolds of 400m presented enhanced levels of cell attachment for larger levels of porosity [17]. Scaffolds of pore size 212-300m (A3, B3) did not appear to promote cell growth beyond day 7, and in particular B3 yielded the worst performing results from the entire set ( Figure 7, bottom row).…”
Section: Structural and Mechanical Propertiessupporting
confidence: 87%
“…An optimum size cannot be concluded from the results as this value seems highly dependent on the conditions of the study (e.g. 25 and 200m had the most positive effect in a range 25-500m [15], 325m when studying 85-325m [16], 400m was preferred when the range studied was 75-900m [17] and 600m in a 300-1000m range [12]). …”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, Ti6Ta4Sn scaffolds have been studied by Li et al 198 In this study, the cell adhesion density was directly proportional to pore sizes in the range of 25–75%, but was inversely proportional in the range of 75–900 μ m. Surface modification by different treatments enhanced osteoblast-like cell adhesion.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 71%
“…Li and coworkers also evaluated various surface treatments of porous Ti6Ta4Sn, noting that a sol-gel HA coating yielded optimal adhesion of osteoblast-like cells. 51 …”
Section: Bone Tissue Engineeringmentioning
confidence: 99%