Handbook of Ionic Substituted Hydroxyapatites 2020
DOI: 10.1016/b978-0-08-102834-6.00013-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of strontium substitution in synthetic apatites for biomedical applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

1
2
0
1

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
1
2
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Of note, the osteogenesis/angiogenesis properties revealed to be much stronger in composite scaffolds than pure SIS, and particularly the osteogenesis/angiogenesis levels were further upregulated in SIS/SrFeHA with respect to SIS/SrHA (figures 5-6). These positive results verified enhanced osteogenesis/angiogenesis effects of SrHA incorporation and are basically corresponding to previous studies that moderate 10 mol% doped SrHA components can significantly motivate osteogenesis/ angiogenesis by promoting cellular proliferation, migration and osteogenic/angiogenic differentiation [47]. More importantly, the enhanced bioactivity of SIS/SrFeHA could be rationally attributed to the simultaneous releasing of Sr 2+ /Fe 3+ into extracts since the concentrations of released Ca/P were basically similar among groups (table S2).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Of note, the osteogenesis/angiogenesis properties revealed to be much stronger in composite scaffolds than pure SIS, and particularly the osteogenesis/angiogenesis levels were further upregulated in SIS/SrFeHA with respect to SIS/SrHA (figures 5-6). These positive results verified enhanced osteogenesis/angiogenesis effects of SrHA incorporation and are basically corresponding to previous studies that moderate 10 mol% doped SrHA components can significantly motivate osteogenesis/ angiogenesis by promoting cellular proliferation, migration and osteogenic/angiogenic differentiation [47]. More importantly, the enhanced bioactivity of SIS/SrFeHA could be rationally attributed to the simultaneous releasing of Sr 2+ /Fe 3+ into extracts since the concentrations of released Ca/P were basically similar among groups (table S2).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…More importantly, the enhanced bioactivity of SIS/SrFeHA could be rationally attributed to the simultaneous releasing of Sr 2+ /Fe 3+ into extracts since the concentrations of released Ca/P were basically similar among groups (table S2). It is wellknown that supplying either Sr 2+ or Fe 3+ in proper doses can potently induce osteogenesis/angiogenesis [47][48][49], while the excessive Sr 2+ /Fe 3+ concentrations will impede their positive effects and even result in cytotoxicity [50,51]. Herein, the concentrations of Sr 2+ and Fe 3+ released into scaffolds extracts were examined around 0.688 ± 0.159-0.837 ± 0.142 mg L −1 and ∼0.145 ± 0.059 respectively (table S2), which were exactly in a secure range and quite beneficial for osteogenic/angiogenic developments as disclosed formerly [49,52].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Comparatively, the bioactivity of Sr-HAP/GCN composites appears to be better. This is due to the interaction of Sr 2+ ions which has a larger ionic radii (1.18 Å) than Ca 2+ ions (1.00 Å) (23). The change in the pH of the SBF solution as a function of time is shown in Figure 6.…”
Section: Phase Content and Crystallinity Of Hap Hap/gcn And Sr-hap/gc...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…La literatura hoy día recoge diversas investigaciones asociadas a la evaluación de la efectividad de las metodologías de síntesis de Sr-HA, estudios sobre el efecto que ocasiona la presencia de este ion en la estructura de la red cristalina de la hidroxiapatita y en sus propiedades, así como, reportes de ensayos de su evaluación in vitro o in vivo. Más allá de que los resultados de las aplicaciones de las Sr-HA han sido muy alentadores (13,14), las investigaciones continúan, y han motivado que estos biomateriales también se hayan considerado como propuestas de plataformas para la liberación de diversos principios activos, Figura 1.…”
Section: Introductionunclassified