1992
DOI: 10.1136/gut.33.6.825
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of stressful life events on bowel symptoms: subjects with irritable bowel syndrome compared with subjects without bowel dysfunction.

Abstract: A standardised inventory of stressful life events and a bowel symptom questionnaire were administered at three month intervals for one year to 383 women who were unselected with respect to bowel symptoms. A NEO Personality Inventory was given initially to assess neuroticism. Subjects who satisfied restrictive diagnostic criteria for irritable bowel syndrome were compared with those who complained of abdominal pain plus altered bowel habits but who did not meet restrictive diagnostic criteria (functional bowel … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

7
226
4
9

Year Published

2001
2001
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
4
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 396 publications
(252 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
7
226
4
9
Order By: Relevance
“…B�tzer et al [19] sho�e� an in�rease� �re�alen�e of �iar-rhea or �onsti�ation (15���%)�, bloating (12��3%)� an� earl� satiet� (54%)� in �iabeti� �atients�� E�en the o�� ratios = 3��77)� �ere signifi�antl� �ifferent in �iabeti� �e-= 3��77)� �ere signifi�antl� �ifferent in �iabeti� �e-3��77)� �ere signifi�antl� �ifferent in �iabeti� �e-3��77)� �ere signifi�antl� �ifferent in �iabeti� �e-�resse� �atients fro� health� subje�ts�� These �ata sho� that gastrointestinal s���to�s �ere �ore �losel� relate� to �s��hiatri� �isturban�es�� On the other han�, it is also �ossible that un�leasant GI s���to�s lea� to in�rease� anxiet� an� �e�ression�� Even so, the studied diabetic patients were significantl� �ore anxious �ith the GI s���to�s of anal blo�kage (53��3% vs 35��5%)�, heartburn (34���% vs 17��7%)�, loose� �ater� stools (2���2% vs 11��3%)� an� �ost�ran�ial illness (2���2% vs 12��9%)� an� the� �ere signifi�antl� �ifferent fro� their �ounter�arts�� It is �o�u�ente� that �s��ho-logi�al �ulnerabilit� is asso�iate� �ith a �oorer out�o�e for �eo�le �ith �hroni� GI s���to�s [22] �� In stu�ie� �ia-beti� �atients �ith se�ere anxiet�, o�� ratios re�eale� that loose��ater� stools (OR = 2��79)�, heart burn (OR = 2��45)�, = 2��79)�, heart burn (OR = 2��45)�, = 2��79)�, heart burn (OR = 2��45)�, 2��79)�, heart burn (OR = 2��45)�, 2��79)�, heart burn (OR = 2��45)�, = 2��45)�, = 2��45)�, 2��45)�, 2��45)�, �ost�ran�ial fullness (OR = 2��39)�, anal blo�kage (OR = = 2��39)�, anal blo�kage (OR = = 2��39)�, anal blo�kage (OR = 2��39)�, anal blo�kage (OR = 2��39)�, anal blo�kage (OR = = = 2��07)� an� ��s�hasia (OR = 1��98)� s���to�s re�aine� = 1��98)� s���to�s re�aine� = 1��98)� s���to�s re�aine� 1��98)� s���to�s re�aine� 1��98)� s���to�s re�aine� signifi�antl� �ifferent fro� health� subje�ts�� O�� ratios re�orte� in a stu�� re�eale� that suffering �iabetes �as asso�iate� �ith suffering a �ental �isor�er [23] �� Gastrointestinal s���to�s negati�el� affe�t health relate� qualit� of life in �iabetes an� �lini�ians shoul� �onsi�er �s��ho-logi�al fa�tors in the treat�ent of GI s���to�s��…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…B�tzer et al [19] sho�e� an in�rease� �re�alen�e of �iar-rhea or �onsti�ation (15���%)�, bloating (12��3%)� an� earl� satiet� (54%)� in �iabeti� �atients�� E�en the o�� ratios = 3��77)� �ere signifi�antl� �ifferent in �iabeti� �e-= 3��77)� �ere signifi�antl� �ifferent in �iabeti� �e-3��77)� �ere signifi�antl� �ifferent in �iabeti� �e-3��77)� �ere signifi�antl� �ifferent in �iabeti� �e-�resse� �atients fro� health� subje�ts�� These �ata sho� that gastrointestinal s���to�s �ere �ore �losel� relate� to �s��hiatri� �isturban�es�� On the other han�, it is also �ossible that un�leasant GI s���to�s lea� to in�rease� anxiet� an� �e�ression�� Even so, the studied diabetic patients were significantl� �ore anxious �ith the GI s���to�s of anal blo�kage (53��3% vs 35��5%)�, heartburn (34���% vs 17��7%)�, loose� �ater� stools (2���2% vs 11��3%)� an� �ost�ran�ial illness (2���2% vs 12��9%)� an� the� �ere signifi�antl� �ifferent fro� their �ounter�arts�� It is �o�u�ente� that �s��ho-logi�al �ulnerabilit� is asso�iate� �ith a �oorer out�o�e for �eo�le �ith �hroni� GI s���to�s [22] �� In stu�ie� �ia-beti� �atients �ith se�ere anxiet�, o�� ratios re�eale� that loose��ater� stools (OR = 2��79)�, heart burn (OR = 2��45)�, = 2��79)�, heart burn (OR = 2��45)�, = 2��79)�, heart burn (OR = 2��45)�, 2��79)�, heart burn (OR = 2��45)�, 2��79)�, heart burn (OR = 2��45)�, = 2��45)�, = 2��45)�, 2��45)�, 2��45)�, �ost�ran�ial fullness (OR = 2��39)�, anal blo�kage (OR = = 2��39)�, anal blo�kage (OR = = 2��39)�, anal blo�kage (OR = 2��39)�, anal blo�kage (OR = 2��39)�, anal blo�kage (OR = = = 2��07)� an� ��s�hasia (OR = 1��98)� s���to�s re�aine� = 1��98)� s���to�s re�aine� = 1��98)� s���to�s re�aine� 1��98)� s���to�s re�aine� 1��98)� s���to�s re�aine� signifi�antl� �ifferent fro� health� subje�ts�� O�� ratios re�orte� in a stu�� re�eale� that suffering �iabetes �as asso�iate� �ith suffering a �ental �isor�er [23] �� Gastrointestinal s���to�s negati�el� affe�t health relate� qualit� of life in �iabetes an� �lini�ians shoul� �onsi�er �s��ho-logi�al fa�tors in the treat�ent of GI s���to�s��…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…[6][7][8][9] This association is probably derived from mutual and reciprocal interactions between the brain and the gut. 8,13 Corticotropin-releasing hormone (CRH), a major mediator of the stress response in the brain-gut axis, can increase intestinal permeability and lead to FD and IBS. In addition, serotonin and the serotonin transporters, which assist the modulation of feelings and behavior such as anxiety and depression, can be associated with brain-gut function in functional GI disorders.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…IBS and fibromyalgia are classified by some authors as central sensitization syndromes (Woolf 2011). A majority of IBS patients associate stressful life events with initiation or exacerbation of their symptoms (Whitehead, et al 1992) and stress is able to act at all levels of the physiopathology of IBS (see below). Globally, a concept has emerged that IBS is the result of a dysfunction of the brain-gut interplay, as conceptualized in the brain-gut axis.…”
Section: Pathophysiologymentioning
confidence: 99%