1995
DOI: 10.1016/0167-8442(95)00028-d
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of stress ratio on fatigue life of carbon-carbon composites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It can be noted from the figure that beam F-5 exhibited higher deflection at any given number of cycles, which may be attributed to the lower concrete strength of beam F-5. Findings and conclusions of the effect of load range and maximum load are in general similar to those reported in the literature for the material level studies (Do et al 1993, Harmon et al 1998, Mahfuz et al 1995 and member level studies (Barnes andMays 1999, Shahawy andBeitleman 1999) studies of unconfined and confined concrete, FRP coupons and RC beams.…”
Section: Test Observations and Failure Modessupporting
confidence: 81%
“…It can be noted from the figure that beam F-5 exhibited higher deflection at any given number of cycles, which may be attributed to the lower concrete strength of beam F-5. Findings and conclusions of the effect of load range and maximum load are in general similar to those reported in the literature for the material level studies (Do et al 1993, Harmon et al 1998, Mahfuz et al 1995 and member level studies (Barnes andMays 1999, Shahawy andBeitleman 1999) studies of unconfined and confined concrete, FRP coupons and RC beams.…”
Section: Test Observations and Failure Modessupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Since this continued up to 50% load level, we were able to find an intersection point at around the 60% marker which was defined as a threshold load level. Below this threshold stress level, we believe the fatigue failure mechanisms such as matrix cracks, filament splitting, and delamination [29][30][31] are significantly slowed down with 1.5% system. And that is quite possible, since nanoinfusion (1.5%) certainly improves the matrix properties and matrix dominated failure modes as we have seen earlier.…”
Section: Fatigue Testsmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…In this method, the approximated fatigue limit w' is obtained by using only one specimen. As shown in figure 3, the stress amplitude was increased by 2 MPa after every application of 2x10 4 cycles. We can approximate the fatigue limit by the stress amplitude of one stage before the specimen breaks within 10 4 cycles of stress application.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 83%