2011
DOI: 10.1007/s11104-011-0843-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of soil pH on rhizoctonia damping-off of sugar beet and disease suppression induced by soil amendment with crop residues

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
11
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
0
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Reflecting on this study, the differences in the soil environmental factors between the diseased and RSD-treated soils, such as the pH and carbon quality and quantity, may have been large enough to exceed the adaptation ranges of the suppressive agents that may have ultimately induced the nontransferability of the disease suppression capability. This interpretation is further supported by the fact that disease suppression markedly declined when the abiotic environment, such as the pH, of the disease-suppressive soil changed greatly (33, 34). Additionally, we also found that many microbial species, such as Zopfiella and Sphingobacterium , were highly influenced by reinoculated microbiota, where their relative abundances in the reestablished soil was associated with their initial abundances in the inoculants.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Reflecting on this study, the differences in the soil environmental factors between the diseased and RSD-treated soils, such as the pH and carbon quality and quantity, may have been large enough to exceed the adaptation ranges of the suppressive agents that may have ultimately induced the nontransferability of the disease suppression capability. This interpretation is further supported by the fact that disease suppression markedly declined when the abiotic environment, such as the pH, of the disease-suppressive soil changed greatly (33, 34). Additionally, we also found that many microbial species, such as Zopfiella and Sphingobacterium , were highly influenced by reinoculated microbiota, where their relative abundances in the reestablished soil was associated with their initial abundances in the inoculants.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…However, we only used pasteurized soil to test the virulence of the isolates. The virulence of pathogens such as multinucleate R. solani , and the activity of antagonistic soil microorganisms on suppressing disease are influenced by soil media [47], [48]. For this reason, it is possible that the observed virulence levels may have been somewhat elevated compared to those in non-pasteurized soil.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the present study small increases in soil pH of 0.2 to 0.4 units was observed when B. carinata pellets were used. Increased suppressiveness of Rhizoctonia damping-off of sugar beet in a near neutral to alkaline soil, compared to acid soil, from use of dried peanut plant residues, has been reported, due to increased activity of specific antagonistic soil microorganisms (Watanabe et al, 2011). Similar disease suppression effects have been obtained by amending soils with composts rich in cellulolytic and oligotrophic actinomycete antagonists (Tuitert et al, 1998;Kasuya et al, 2006;Ros et al, 2006).…”
Section: Carbon Sourcementioning
confidence: 72%