2014
DOI: 10.15384/kjhp.2014.14.4.155
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Smoking Status on Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease Prevalence in Males 40 years and Older: Findings from the Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey

Abstract: Background: This is a study of the prevalence of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), which shows high mortality worldwide, and the effects of smoking on COPD by using data from the Korea National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey V. Methods: FEV1/FEV6<0.73 was used as a diagnostic criterion of COPD. Frequency analysis for prevalence, descriptive statistics for general characteristics and ventilation rate according to age-specifications, and complex sample logistic regression analysis for the ef… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 15 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Among Korean males aged 50 or older, the possibility of getting COPD is 2.1 times higher among smokers and 1.5 times higher among ex-smokers than non-smokers, which means smoking has a significant effect on the likelihood of developing COPD. 22 The main cause of COPD is smoking in Korea and most advanced countries, so quitting smoking is vital to preventing COPD. 2 There was no significant difference in frequency of exercise between groups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Among Korean males aged 50 or older, the possibility of getting COPD is 2.1 times higher among smokers and 1.5 times higher among ex-smokers than non-smokers, which means smoking has a significant effect on the likelihood of developing COPD. 22 The main cause of COPD is smoking in Korea and most advanced countries, so quitting smoking is vital to preventing COPD. 2 There was no significant difference in frequency of exercise between groups.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%