2013
DOI: 10.1007/s11295-013-0682-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of silvicultural practices on genetic diversity and population structure of white spruce in Saskatchewan

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
11
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

2
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
4
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…brutia (AlHawija et al 2014) and Dalbergia sissoo (Pandey et al 2004). The results previously obtained in Picea glauca by RAPD markers (Rajora 1999) were reassessed using microsatellites by Fageria & Rajora (2014); a similar trend of reduction in GD was found, but the differences between progeny from phenotypic selection and natural regeneration were not significant (Tab. 3).…”
Section: Reforestation (Artificial Regeneration)supporting
confidence: 59%
“…brutia (AlHawija et al 2014) and Dalbergia sissoo (Pandey et al 2004). The results previously obtained in Picea glauca by RAPD markers (Rajora 1999) were reassessed using microsatellites by Fageria & Rajora (2014); a similar trend of reduction in GD was found, but the differences between progeny from phenotypic selection and natural regeneration were not significant (Tab. 3).…”
Section: Reforestation (Artificial Regeneration)supporting
confidence: 59%
“…The genetic diversity of post-harvest young natural regeneration was similar to that of unharvested old-growth. In a subsequent study, using microsatellite markers, similar patterns of genetic diversity among old-growth, young natural regeneration, plantations and phenotypic selections were observed (Fageria and Rajora, 2014). These studies while differing in some conclusions, demonstrated that genetic diversity can be maintained by natural regeneration systems in white spruce.…”
Section: Clearcut Harvesting Followed By Natural or Artificial Regenementioning
confidence: 65%
“…Although founders showed no half- or full-sib trees (Table 1 ), the identification of second cousins (31.5%) indicates that not all trees were equally spaced within the sampled stands. Seed orchards may be designed to maintain the genetic base of the parents producing deployable seedlots; however orchards also often have a different genetic arrangement when compared with natural stands 38 , which may lead to a significant increase in relatedness. In Alberta 8 , every seedlot must meet an Ne level ≥ 18, however, combined with uneven contributions and increased relatedness within these seedlots, policy requirements may be difficult to meet.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%