Cu(In,Ga)Se 2 (CIGS) is an established thin-film photovoltaic material, with record cells reaching efficiencies of 22.6% [1] (or 23.4% with sulfur inclusion). [2] There are still significant improvements to be made, however. The best-performing cells have bandgaps in the region of 1.0-1.2 eV but the optimum value for a single-junction solar cell is 1.34 eV. [3] It would also be advantageous to fabricate high-efficiency widegap CIGS devices to enable the material's use as a top cell in a tandem/multijunction device. To achieve high tandem efficiencies (in the two-terminal configuration), it is estimated that bandgaps of 1.6 and 0.9 eV would be required for top and bottom cells, respectively (or 1.91, 1.37, and 0.93 eV, for the top, intermediate, and bottom cells in a triplejunction device). [4] Near-maximum theoretical efficiency can be attained for top cells with bandgaps in the region 1.4-1.9 eV in a four-terminal tandem configuration. [5] Furthermore, the increased output voltages and reduced currents of widegap devices allow solar modules with reduced resistive losses and less dead area in monolithic series connections to be manufactured. By increasing the ratio of Ga to In in the material (referred to henceforth as the GGI, [Ga]/([Ga] þ [In])), the bandgap is also increased, primarily through an energetic increase in the conduction band minimum. However, the open-circuit voltage (V OC ) does not increase linearly with the bandgap. [6,7] Currently it seems that the optimal GGI lies in the range of 0.2-0.3 with values in excess of this upper bound leading to deterioration in device performance. [7][8][9] There are multiple suspected causes for the negative impact of high GGI ratios, including the formation of an unfavorable conduction band offset between the CIGS absorber and cadmium-sulfide (CdS) buffer layer; [10,11] Cu enrichment of grain boundaries (acting either as a region of high recombination or as highly conductive shunt pathways); [12,13] tetragonal distortion of the lattice; [14] or the increase in the energetic depth and density of malign defects. [9,[15][16][17] The incorporation of silver into CIGS, substituting some of the copper atoms, is expected to be beneficial, improving the conduction band offset between the silveralloyed CIGS (ACIGS) and the commonly used CdS buffer layer. [18] Silver incorporation in CIGS is also observed to increase grain size [19] and reduce the melting point of the alloy, which is expected to reduce the density of defects in the material. [20][21][22] With a clear motivation to investigate the incorporation of Ag into CIGS and the realization of high-performance widegap CIGS-based devices, we produced a large series of ACIGS cells, spanning a wide range of compositions. [23] From this work, a compositional window of interest was identified with GGI in the range of 0.66-0.79 and a silver-to-silver-and-copper (AAC) ratio of 0.47-0.67. The upper limit of AAC was chosen to reduce the amount of ordered vacancy compounds (OVCs), forming at the rear of the absorber layer, as ...