1992
DOI: 10.17660/actahortic.1992.305.14
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of Selective Screening of the Daylight Spectrum, and of Twilight on Plant Growth in Greenhouses

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
2
2

Year Published

2001
2001
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The duration of the treatment (30 min) was comparable to the duration of an average twilight, whereas the daily light integral and the duration of the photoperiod was comparable to a winter day in the Northern hemisphere. The EOD twilight causing increased elongation contradicts earlier findings with chrysanthemums by Mortensen and Moe (1992). Mortensen and Moe (1992) did not show a significant effect from EOD elimination of twilight using black-out curtains on plant height.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 78%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The duration of the treatment (30 min) was comparable to the duration of an average twilight, whereas the daily light integral and the duration of the photoperiod was comparable to a winter day in the Northern hemisphere. The EOD twilight causing increased elongation contradicts earlier findings with chrysanthemums by Mortensen and Moe (1992). Mortensen and Moe (1992) did not show a significant effect from EOD elimination of twilight using black-out curtains on plant height.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 78%
“…The EOD twilight causing increased elongation contradicts earlier findings with chrysanthemums by Mortensen and Moe (1992). Mortensen and Moe (1992) did not show a significant effect from EOD elimination of twilight using black-out curtains on plant height. Experiments with chrysanthemum were performed during summer in Norway.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 78%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The length of the normal photoperiod (17.25 h) may have also attenuated some EOD-FR responses. Lund et al (2007) found that chrysanthemum (Chrysanthemum morifolium) 'Coral Charm' grown under a 9-hour photoperiod and 30-minute EOD-FR treatments with R:FRs of 0.4 or 0.7 displayed increased plant height compared with an EOD-R (R:FR 5 2.4) treatment; these authors cited earlier work by Mortensen and Moe (1992) showing that natural EOD radiation quality did not affect chrysanthemum grown under longer photoperiods (12-18.5 hours), as well as work by Downs et al (1957) showing that the effect of EOD-FR on elongation was reduced for bean (Phaseolus vulgaris) when grown under longer relative to shorter photoperiods. Lund et al (2008) conducted further work using the same EOD-FR treatments and study taxa as Lund et al (2007), but with photoperiod durations of 9, 14, and 19 hours; they found EOD-FR was more effective in promoting an increase in plant height when grown under the 9-hour treatment compared with the 14-and 19-hour treatments.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 88%