2002
DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2427.2002.00837.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of riparian leaf dynamics on periphyton photosynthesis and light utilisation efficiency

Abstract: 1. Streambed light regimes change dramatically when riparian trees gain leaves in spring and lose them in autumn. This study examined the effect of these changes on periphyton photosynthetic characteristics, primary production, and light utilisation efficiency in two eastern Tennessee streams. 2. Photosynthesis–irradiance responses were measured at intervals covering leaf emergence and abscission in spring and autumn. Photosynthetic efficiency (αchl) increased with declining streambed irradiances during spring… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
44
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(47 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
3
44
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Ecological indicator Values of Chl a obtained in the primary production experiment were similar to those found in other canopied headwater streams (Kiffney and Bull, 2000;Hill and Dimick, 2002;Roberts et al, 2004). Although we expected primary production to be an appropriate environmental indicator of changes induced by sunlight reduction following afforestation, periphyton growth did not show the anticipated differences.…”
Section: Functional Attributessupporting
confidence: 71%
“…Ecological indicator Values of Chl a obtained in the primary production experiment were similar to those found in other canopied headwater streams (Kiffney and Bull, 2000;Hill and Dimick, 2002;Roberts et al, 2004). Although we expected primary production to be an appropriate environmental indicator of changes induced by sunlight reduction following afforestation, periphyton growth did not show the anticipated differences.…”
Section: Functional Attributessupporting
confidence: 71%
“…However, we did not see the sharp contrast we saw with allochthonous inputs. Chlorophyll a concentrations and periphyton biomass did not vary significantly along the agricultural land-use gradient and were similar to values typical of forested (Sponseller et al, 2001;Hill & Dimick, 2002), agricultural (McTammany et al, 2007. and reforested (McTammany et al, 2007) streams in the southern Appalachians.…”
Section: Effects Of Agricultural Land Use On C Source To Streamssupporting
confidence: 62%
“…where d is mean depth (m), 0.375 is the molar ratio of C to O 2 , 1.2 is the photosynthetic quotient (Hill & Dimick, 2002), and 365 is the number of days in a year. Daily R E rates were converted to g C m -2 y -1 as: Table 1 Characteristics of each stream site including riparian tree basal area (BA) and tree density (TD) within 3 and 10 m of each stream reach, stream canopy cover (SCC) along each 100-m stream reach, riparian canopy cover (RCC) within 10 m of each stream reach, grass groundcover (GGC) within 10 m of each stream reach, and agricultural influence …”
Section: Metabolismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Resources are variable in time, and this is well exemplified in temperate regions where the availability of leaf litter is seasonal with light inputs closely linked to litterfall (Hill and Dimick, 2002;Bernhardt and Likens, 2004;Roberts et al, 2004). In those streams, detritus and primary production dynamics are affected by terrestrial plant phenology (i.e.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%