2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecolind.2015.04.033
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Pine afforestation changes more strongly community structure than ecosystem functioning in grassland mountain streams

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

1
8
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 64 publications
1
8
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…NGE results on Chl a and AFDM supported the higher grazing effect on grassland substrates compared to the afforestation. In a previous study in the area, Principe et al (2015) proposed that higher grazing in grassland streams and heavy shading by afforestation contributed to the lack of differences in biofilm accrual between both stream types, which is confirmed by our results.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…NGE results on Chl a and AFDM supported the higher grazing effect on grassland substrates compared to the afforestation. In a previous study in the area, Principe et al (2015) proposed that higher grazing in grassland streams and heavy shading by afforestation contributed to the lack of differences in biofilm accrual between both stream types, which is confirmed by our results.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Cibils Martina, Márquez, Principe, Gari, and Albariño (2014) showed that larvae of the Trichoptera Helicopsyche, a common and abundant scraper, exerted greater control on algal communities developed in a grassland stream than when they were grown in an afforested one; they argued that stronger grazing was stimulated by higher periphyton quality (more autotrophic and with higher digestible organic matter) belonging to grassland streams. Principe, Márquez, Cibils Martina, Jobbágy, and Albariño (2015) which performed a 30-day field experiment in the same streams of this study with only grazing-exposed substrates, found that biofilm accrual (i.e., biomass per surface unit and time) was similar between three grassland and three afforested streams. Overall, those results suggest that opposing forces happening in grassland (high light levels plus strong grazing) and pine streams (low light and weak grazing) resulted in similar accrual rates.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 58%
“…Revegetation of grassland is increasing rapidly in many parts of the world, and has attracted current scientific interest for its contribution to mitigating emissions of carbon dioxide, controlling soil erosion, restoring degraded land, and potential impacts on ecosystem function and long-term sustainability (Jackson et al 2002;Makitalo et al 2010;Don et al 2011;Principe et al 2015;Buendia et al 2016). The transition from grassland to tree and (or) shrub plantation modifies the quantity and quality of above-and belowground biomasses, soil organic matter content, vegetation structure, microclimate conditions, and soil nutrient cycles (Céspedes-Payret et al 2012;Souza et al 2013).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…En el caso de las sierras de Córdoba en la región central de Argentina los pastizales de altura han sido sometidos a diferentes acciones antrópicas, entre las que se encuentra la forestación comercial con especies arbóreas de crecimiento rápido, principalmente pinos (Jobbágy et al, 2006;Plevich, Núñez, Cantero, Demaestri y Viale, 2002). Esta modificación en el uso de la tierra se extiende hasta las riberas de los arroyos, provocando alteraciones en la intensidad lumínica que incide sobre los mismos (Principe, Márquez, Cibils-Martina, Jobbágy y Albariño, 2015). Esta situación plantea potenciales efectos sobre la diversidad y abundancia de plantas acuáticas, y de manera concomitante sobre la fauna de macroinvertebrados fitófilos.…”
Section: Discussionunclassified