2016
DOI: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2015.09.005
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of resistance training on muscle strength, exercise capacity, and mobility in middle-aged and elderly patients with coronary artery disease: A meta-analysis

Abstract: Resistance training could increase exercise capacity and muscle strength in middle-aged and elderly patients, and mobility in elderly patients, with CAD.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

3
77
0
5

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(85 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
3
77
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…However, this result did not reach statistical significance ( t [34.7] = 1.1, p = .28; Figure b), likely due to the large variability in change in CRF following exercise training (Lundby, Montero, & Joyner, ). The trend for improvement in CRF from baseline for the RT group is perhaps not surprising given the study design of using an active exercise group, and is consistent with a recent meta‐analysis that demonstrated RT can significantly improve trueV˙O2 MAX compared to nonactive controls (Yamamoto, Hotta, Ota, Mori, & Matsunaga, ). Participants were not prohibited from engaging in other physical activity outside of the exercise intervention program.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 78%
“…However, this result did not reach statistical significance ( t [34.7] = 1.1, p = .28; Figure b), likely due to the large variability in change in CRF following exercise training (Lundby, Montero, & Joyner, ). The trend for improvement in CRF from baseline for the RT group is perhaps not surprising given the study design of using an active exercise group, and is consistent with a recent meta‐analysis that demonstrated RT can significantly improve trueV˙O2 MAX compared to nonactive controls (Yamamoto, Hotta, Ota, Mori, & Matsunaga, ). Participants were not prohibited from engaging in other physical activity outside of the exercise intervention program.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 78%
“…For example, search strategies for seven meta-analyses were critically limited to five online databases or less (Chou, Hwang, & Wu, 2012; de Vries et al, 2012; Gine-Garriga et al, 2010; Gu & Conn, 2008; Howe, Rochester, Neil, Skelton, & Ballinger, 2011; Nicola & Catherine, 2011; Yamamoto, Hotta, Ota, Mori, & Matsunaga, 2015). The most common databases searched were Medline, PubMed, and CINAHL, all of which house similarly indexed citations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This controversy is evident in clinical practice 8 as well as in the available study results, where the training intensity has been set between 30 and 80% of one repetition maximum (1RM), which makes it difficult to evaluate the overall results. [8][9][10] The former reluctance to implement resistance training in cardiac rehabilitation was mainly based on the caution that its performance may lead to an inadequate blood pressure response and/or other inadequate cardiovascular responses. However, an inadequate response can be avoided by taking into account influencing factors, such as the mode of exercise (the isometric/isotonic components), the amount of the muscle mass used, the exercise intensity, the number and speed/rhythm of repetitions, the duration of loading, the number of sets and the resting period between sets.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7 Musculoskeletal comorbidities are common on admission to cardiac rehabilitation. 20,21 In addition, an increasing deconditioning of the skeletal muscle with a reduction in muscle mass (sarcopenia) and muscle strength is to expected in elderly patients, 9,21 in patients with diabetes mellitus 22 and in patients with a reduced left ventricular ejection fraction. 23 Furthermore, the majority of patients admitted to cardiac rehabilitation have no or little experience in resistance exercise and/or the use of the equipment.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%