2019
DOI: 10.1007/s10103-019-02812-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of red and near-infrared LED light therapy on full-thickness skin graft in rats

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
19
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
19
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Tani et al [50] irradiated human osteoblasts and mesenchymal stromal cells with 0.4 J/cm 2 using either red (635 nm) or NIR (808 nm) and found that red was more effective in promoting bone regeneration while NIR modified the cytoskeleton assembly and mineralization pattern. Using a full thickness skin graft rat model, Martignago et al [51] demonstrated that red LED (630 nm) was more efficient in tissue repair as assessed by skin graft score, level of transforming growth factor β protein expression, and density of collagen fibers compared with NIR (850 nm). Keszler et al [52] demonstrated that irradiating ex vivo murine facial arteries resulted in much more vasodilatation when using red (670 nm) compared with NIR LED (830 nm) irradiation (10 mW/cm 2 , 6 J/cm 2 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tani et al [50] irradiated human osteoblasts and mesenchymal stromal cells with 0.4 J/cm 2 using either red (635 nm) or NIR (808 nm) and found that red was more effective in promoting bone regeneration while NIR modified the cytoskeleton assembly and mineralization pattern. Using a full thickness skin graft rat model, Martignago et al [51] demonstrated that red LED (630 nm) was more efficient in tissue repair as assessed by skin graft score, level of transforming growth factor β protein expression, and density of collagen fibers compared with NIR (850 nm). Keszler et al [52] demonstrated that irradiating ex vivo murine facial arteries resulted in much more vasodilatation when using red (670 nm) compared with NIR LED (830 nm) irradiation (10 mW/cm 2 , 6 J/cm 2 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The photons emitted by LED irradiation are absorbed by specific cellular photoreceptors, initiating several intracellular reactions, which lead to changes in membrane potential, O 2 consumption and RNA and DNA synthesis (Prindeze et al, 2012;Avci et al, 2013). These events contribute to the therapeutic effects of LED irradiation demonstrated in the repair of some tissues, such as muscle, skin, tendon, and periodontium (de Melo et al, 2016;Chen et al, 2019;Martignago et al, 2019;Nascimento et al, 2019). Despite benefiting tissue repair, the therapeutic potential of LED irradiation is still controversial due to the divergence of protocols used (Yeh et al, 2010).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Martignago and collaborators Martignago et al (2020) carried out a study in which skin grafts were irradiated daily for ten consecutive days, starting immediately after the surgery, using a red (630 nm) or near infrared (850 nm) LED. The results showed that the red wavelength LED signi icantly enhanced the skin graft score in relation to the NIR group and increased the expression of TGFβ and the density of collagen ibers compared with the other experimental groups.…”
Section: Figure 5 Differences In the Expression Of Tgf-β1 Between Led And Control Groupsmentioning
confidence: 99%