2018
DOI: 10.1007/s00107-018-1326-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of recycled fiber content on the properties of medium density fiberboard

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

3
26
0
3

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(51 citation statements)
references
References 24 publications
3
26
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…As can be seen in Figure 8 , the highest WA for top and bottom HDF side was obtained for V0, accordingly, 255 g m −2 and 273 g m −2 , while the lowest was for V10, with results of top side WA of 175 g m −2 and bottom side WA of 185 g m −2 . All panels with HDF-r had ≈30% lower top (V2 = 187 g m −2 ; V5 = 186 g m −2 ) and bottom (V2 = 191 g m −2 V5 = 187 g m −2 ) surface water absorption compared to V0, which is consistent with other works [ 21 ]. Moreover, in all panels, higher WA could be observed for the bottom side compared to the top side.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…As can be seen in Figure 8 , the highest WA for top and bottom HDF side was obtained for V0, accordingly, 255 g m −2 and 273 g m −2 , while the lowest was for V10, with results of top side WA of 175 g m −2 and bottom side WA of 185 g m −2 . All panels with HDF-r had ≈30% lower top (V2 = 187 g m −2 ; V5 = 186 g m −2 ) and bottom (V2 = 191 g m −2 V5 = 187 g m −2 ) surface water absorption compared to V0, which is consistent with other works [ 21 ]. Moreover, in all panels, higher WA could be observed for the bottom side compared to the top side.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 91%
“…The TS24 of V2 (32.82%) increased ≈5% compared to V0, while V5 had an increase of ≈5% to 34.25%. An increase in TS of panels with HDF-r might be caused by their rougher structure and their smaller dimensions compared to virgin fibers [ 21 , 24 ]. The highest TS2 and TS24 were measured for V10, being 11.71% and 34.54%, respectively, which was ≈15% and ≈10% higher than V0.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Fiberboards are wood-based panels produced by breaking down softwood and hardwood material into fibers, mixing them with wax and a formaldehyde-based thermosetting resin, such as urea-formaldehyde (UF), phenol formaldehyde, or melamine-urea formaldehyde, and forming panels by applying pressure and high temperature in a hot press [ 14 , 15 ]. Depending on the density, fiberboards can be classified into low-density fiberboards, with densities less than 400 kg·m −3 , medium-density fiberboards, with densities ranging from 400 to 900 kg·m −3 , and high-density fiberboards (HDF), with densities ranging from 900 to 1100 kg·m −3 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pH of the extract solutions of UF resins‐bonded MDFs was in the range of 4.9–5.1, while those of MDFs bonded with pure OS were in the range 3.8–4.4. The pH of virgin Red pine fiber was reported to be around 4.8–5.5 . Therefore, it was clear that most of the OS adhesive was extracted after hydrolysis of OS‐bonded MDFs at 25 °C for 6 h, while only wood extractives were extracted from UF resins‐bonded MDFs.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%