2010
DOI: 10.1002/ps.2042
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Effects of pymetrozine, an antifeedant of Hemiptera, on Asian citrus psyllid, Diaphorina citri, feeding behavior, survival and transmission of Candidatus Liberibacter asiaticus

Abstract: Pymetrozine exhibited moderate antifeedant effects by modifying the feeding behavior of ACP adults with short residual activity. The impact of pymetrozine on survival of nymphs was greater than on adults at the higher concentrations tested. Pymetrozine also reduced the acquisition and transmission of Las by feeding ACP adults up to 21 and 18%, respectively, compared with untreated controls.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Insecticide susceptibility is known to vary among different life stages and among different body (abdomen) color morphs of the same life stage of ACP and cotton whitefly, Bemisia tabaci (Gennadius), owing to differences in feeding behavior, total protein content and activity levels of detoxifying enzymes . Although experiments with nymphs and adults are not directly comparable owing to differences in endpoint observation, in general, ACP nymphs were more susceptible to pymetrozine than adults on potted plants sprayed with pymetrozine at the labeled rate (52 mg L −1 ) . Eggs of ACP were more susceptible to buprofezin and diflubenzuron than nymphs, while fourth‐instar nymphs were less susceptible to carbaryl, chlorpyrifos, fenpropathrin and spinetoram than adults .…”
Section: Chemical Control Of Acpmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Insecticide susceptibility is known to vary among different life stages and among different body (abdomen) color morphs of the same life stage of ACP and cotton whitefly, Bemisia tabaci (Gennadius), owing to differences in feeding behavior, total protein content and activity levels of detoxifying enzymes . Although experiments with nymphs and adults are not directly comparable owing to differences in endpoint observation, in general, ACP nymphs were more susceptible to pymetrozine than adults on potted plants sprayed with pymetrozine at the labeled rate (52 mg L −1 ) . Eggs of ACP were more susceptible to buprofezin and diflubenzuron than nymphs, while fourth‐instar nymphs were less susceptible to carbaryl, chlorpyrifos, fenpropathrin and spinetoram than adults .…”
Section: Chemical Control Of Acpmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently the world's main producer of Mexican lemon fruit, the Apatzingán Valley, with an area of 45715 ha, is responsible for 60% of the total national production . Since its detection in Mexico, chemical control through the use of pyrethroids, organophosphates, neonicotinoids, and spynosin insecticides remains the most practical method for reducing populations of D. citri . However, as a consequence of extensive application schedules and, in some cases, repeated sequential use of the same insecticide or products with the same mode of action, this approach is producing unsatisfactory results, with the development of variable levels of resistance…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to the direct effects of afidopyropen on population growth, sublethal concentrations may also reduce the rate of transmission of Candidatus Liberacter bacteria between citrus hosts as a consequence of reduced D. citri feeding. This hypothesis warrants further investigation; however, reduced pathogen transmission by D. citri caused by sublethal insecticide exposure has been demonstrated previously (Boina et al 2011). Exposure to sublethal insecticide concentrations is known to cause physiological changes that reduce development and fecundity and lead to an overall fitness decline in certain insect species (Harnoto et al 1984;Luckey 1968;Omer and Leigh 1995;Stark and Banks 2003).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 81%